Most Ordinary Phones Trip a Naive Clock-Anomaly Check: Base Rates of Clock Anomalies in Unselected Mobile Extractions

Checks for clock manipulation on phones compare clocks or look for impossible times, and are tested on devices whose clock was changed on purpose. How often ordinary devices show the same signs, which sets the false-alarm rate, has not been reported. We pre-registered fifteen checks computed from the data, on file times in full file system extractions, the wall-clock and continuous-time pairs of the iOS unified log, and the clock state in Android bug reports, and applied them read-only to every readable extraction of a research corpus: 46 devices with full file systems, 31 iPhones with time-sync records and 7 Android bug reports. Simple checks fired on almost every device: a file time within a day of the Unix epoch on 41 of 46, a file dated over 48 h after acquisition on 16 of 46, a wall-clock step above 60 s within a boot on 23 of 31, and some file-system check on 45 of 46. Most file-system alarms are constant default times and future-dated cache files; most boot-order alarms are iPhones booting on an unset clock. A check against the build time never fired. At these base rates, a simple check's alarm barely changes the odds of manipulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24023525
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Most Ordinary Phones Trip a Naive Clock-Anomaly Check: Base Rates of Clock Anomalies in Unselected Mobile Extractions

Daniel Kwaku Ntiamoah Addai, Selorm Adjabeng, Kingsley Albert Egyir, Sanders Larweh Tetteh
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital and Cyber Forensics
preprint

Most Ordinary Phones Trip a Naive Clock-Anomaly Check: Base Rates of Clock Anomalies in Unselected Mobile Extractions

Daniel Kwaku Ntiamoah Addai, Selorm Adjabeng, Kingsley Albert Egyir, Sanders Larweh Tetteh
preprint en

Abstract

Checks for clock manipulation on phones compare clocks or look for impossible times, and are tested on devices whose clock was changed on purpose. How often ordinary devices show the same signs, which sets the false-alarm rate, has not been reported. We pre-registered fifteen checks computed from the data, on file times in full file system extractions, the wall-clock and continuous-time pairs of the iOS unified log, and the clock state in Android bug reports, and applied them read-only to every readable extraction of a research corpus: 46 devices with full file systems, 31 iPhones with time-sync records and 7 Android bug reports. Simple checks fired on almost every device: a file time within a day of the Unix epoch on 41 of 46, a file dated over 48 h after acquisition on 16 of 46, a wall-clock step above 60 s within a boot on 23 of 31, and some file-system check on 45 of 46. Most file-system alarms are constant default times and future-dated cache files; most boot-order alarms are iPhones booting on an unset clock. A check against the build time never fired. At these base rates, a simple check's alarm barely changes the odds of manipulation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Northeastern University (US), Prudential Financial (United States) (US)
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon