Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals

Introduction Care pathways support the coordination and delivery of care, but their optimization requires a better understanding of the factors that influence their organization and evolution. This study aimed to define determinants of care pathways (DCPs) and identify invariant determinants of care pathways (IDCPs). Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 French healthcare professionals, including clinicians, academics, and institutional stakeholders. Data were analyzed thematically in accordance with COREQ guidelines. Results Two main themes were identified. The first concerned the characteristics of DCPs and comprised three subthemes: their distinction from health determinants (HDs), the relevance of identifying DCPs, and their contribution to care-pathway modeling. Participants characterized HDs as factors influencing individual or population health status, whereas DCPs were described as factors primarily shaping the organization, accessibility, continuity and progression of care. Both may vary and interact over time. The second theme concerned the identification of IDCPs and comprised four categories: health status, systemic and organizational determinants, social and environmental determinants, and individual and psychological determinants. These categories were considered to be systematically present across care pathways, although their specific manifestations and effects varied according to the patient, context and stage of care. Conclusions IDCPs provide a common analytical framework for analyzing and optimizing CPs. Systematically considering these categories, together with HDs and specific DCPs, may help identify modifiable points of disruption and support the design, evaluation and modeling of more coordinated and patient-centered care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1978824
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals

Florence Carrouel, Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles, Bérénice Perroud, Claude Dussart et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Identification of invariant determinants to improve care pathways: a qualitative study among healthcare professionals

Florence Carrouel, Benjamin du Sartz de Vigneulles, Bérénice Perroud, Claude Dussart, Gérard Mick, Romain Lan
article en

Abstract

Introduction Care pathways support the coordination and delivery of care, but their optimization requires a better understanding of the factors that influence their organization and evolution. This study aimed to define determinants of care pathways (DCPs) and identify invariant determinants of care pathways (IDCPs). Methods A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 21 French healthcare professionals, including clinicians, academics, and institutional stakeholders. Data were analyzed thematically in accordance with COREQ guidelines. Results Two main themes were identified. The first concerned the characteristics of DCPs and comprised three subthemes: their distinction from health determinants (HDs), the relevance of identifying DCPs, and their contribution to care-pathway modeling. Participants characterized HDs as factors influencing individual or population health status, whereas DCPs were described as factors primarily shaping the organization, accessibility, continuity and progression of care. Both may vary and interact over time. The second theme concerned the identification of IDCPs and comprised four categories: health status, systemic and organizational determinants, social and environmental determinants, and individual and psychological determinants. These categories were considered to be systematically present across care pathways, although their specific manifestations and effects varied according to the patient, context and stage of care. Conclusions IDCPs provide a common analytical framework for analyzing and optimizing CPs. Systematically considering these categories, together with HDs and specific DCPs, may help identify modifiable points of disruption and support the design, evaluation and modeling of more coordinated and patient-centered care.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), Hospices Civils de Lyon (FR), Translational Innovation in Medicine and Complexity (FR), Parcours santé systémique (FR), Anthropologie Bio-Culturelle, Droit, Éthique & Santé (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon