Patient-Provider Communication, Treatment, and Survival in a Population-Based Cohort: The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project

PURPOSE: Patient-provider communication (PPC) may be associated with receipt of definitive prostate cancer treatment and long-term outcomes. We examined these associations in a racially and geographically diverse population-based cohort. METHODS: We analyzed data for 2,258 Black and White participants enrolled in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (2004-2009), with longitudinal vital status follow-up through 2020. PPC was measured using three subscales: contextual knowledge, communication content, and interpersonal treatment. We evaluated associations between PPC and receipt of definitive treatment and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Communication content emerged as the most consistent PPC domain associated with clinical outcomes. Per five-point increase in communication content, the odds of receiving definitive treatment were higher for radiation therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.15 to 1.94]) and radical prostatectomy (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.39 to 2.14]) compared with nondefinitive treatment. Communication content was also associated with greater likelihood of surgery within 3 months among prostatectomy recipients (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.29 to 2.13]), with a directionally similar but nonsignificant association for radiation therapy. In competing-risk models, higher communication content was associated with lower prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99]). Associations varied by race and rurality, but formal interaction tests did not indicate effect measure modification. CONCLUSION: We found that higher communication content scores were associated with higher receipt of definitive treatment, shorter time to surgery, and lower PCSM. These findings highlight communication as a potentially modifiable component of the patient-provider encounter. Communication based on high informational quality is associated with long-term prostate cancer outcomes and represents a candidate target for future intervention research to improve prostate cancer care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/op-26-00308
Primary Topic
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Patient-Provider Communication, Treatment, and Survival in a Population-Based Cohort: The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project

Laura Farnan, Jennifer Leigh Lund, Jeannette T. Bensen, Lixin Song et al.
2 links
JCO Oncology Practice
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
article

Patient-Provider Communication, Treatment, and Survival in a Population-Based Cohort: The North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project

Laura Farnan, Jennifer Leigh Lund, Jeannette T. Bensen, Lixin Song, Jeanny H. Wang, Hung‐Jui Tan, Deshira D. Wallace, B. H. Carmichael, Shaun R. Jones, Eboneé N. Butler
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-provider communication (PPC) may be associated with receipt of definitive prostate cancer treatment and long-term outcomes. We examined these associations in a racially and geographically diverse population-based cohort. METHODS: We analyzed data for 2,258 Black and White participants enrolled in the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (2004-2009), with longitudinal vital status follow-up through 2020. PPC was measured using three subscales: contextual knowledge, communication content, and interpersonal treatment. We evaluated associations between PPC and receipt of definitive treatment and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Communication content emerged as the most consistent PPC domain associated with clinical outcomes. Per five-point increase in communication content, the odds of receiving definitive treatment were higher for radiation therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% CI, 1.15 to 1.94]) and radical prostatectomy (OR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.39 to 2.14]) compared with nondefinitive treatment. Communication content was also associated with greater likelihood of surgery within 3 months among prostatectomy recipients (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.29 to 2.13]), with a directionally similar but nonsignificant association for radiation therapy. In competing-risk models, higher communication content was associated with lower prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM; subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61 to 0.99]). Associations varied by race and rurality, but formal interaction tests did not indicate effect measure modification. CONCLUSION: We found that higher communication content scores were associated with higher receipt of definitive treatment, shorter time to surgery, and lower PCSM. These findings highlight communication as a potentially modifiable component of the patient-provider encounter. Communication based on high informational quality is associated with long-term prostate cancer outcomes and represents a candidate target for future intervention research to improve prostate cancer care delivery.

JCO Oncology Practice
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon