Effect of deflection loupes on cavity preparation quality and ergonomics

The new deflection loupes are very different from traditional loupes in terms of optics design. They enable the user to look straight ahead while operating on the patient, therefore eliminating the head tilt. This study evaluated cavity preparation quality (class II cavity), procedure time, and ergonomics of general dentistry residents using different types of magnification (naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe). This study used randomized group allocation with fixed sequential design. Thirty general dentistry residents performed class II cavity preparations on plastic right mandibular first molars mounted in manikin using three types of magnification: naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe. The posture was evaluated using the modified Posture Assessment Instrument (PAI). The cavity preparation quality scores, procedure time, posture scores were compared between groups using the Friedman test and Dunn’s tests with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Best cavity preparation quality was achieved by using deflection loupe (deflection loupe 79.9 ± 13.0 vs. naked eye 62.8 ± 6.7, p < 0.001;deflection loupe 79.9 ± 13.0 vs. traditional loupe 71.5 ± 9.9, p = 0.007). The procedure time of deflection loupe group was longer than the traditional loupe group (493.2 ± 190.8s vs. 333.6 ± 128.0s, p = 0.024). Deflection loupe group had better overall posture scores (naked eye 8.80 ± 0.81 vs. deflection loupe 7.47 ± 0.9, p < 0.001; traditional loupe 8.60 ± 0.86 vs. deflection loupe 7.47 ± 0.90, p = 0.002) and neck posture scores (deflection loupe 2.57 ± 0.68 vs. naked eye 3.87 ± 0.35, p < 0.001; deflection loupe 2.57 ± 0.68 vs. traditional loupe deflection loupe 3.50 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) . The findings of this study suggest that deflection loupes may offer ergonomic and quality advantages over the naked eye and traditional loupes in the context of cavity preparation. However, the prolonged procedure time observed with deflection loupes indicates a potential learning curve or slower initial adaptation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-10333-2
Primary Topic
Occupational health in dentistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Effect of deflection loupes on cavity preparation quality and ergonomics

Xiao Wang, Kexian Xie, Pin Lv, Ning Ma
1 links
BMC Oral Health
Occupational health in dentistry
article

Effect of deflection loupes on cavity preparation quality and ergonomics

Xiao Wang, Kexian Xie, Pin Lv, Ning Ma
article en

Abstract

The new deflection loupes are very different from traditional loupes in terms of optics design. They enable the user to look straight ahead while operating on the patient, therefore eliminating the head tilt. This study evaluated cavity preparation quality (class II cavity), procedure time, and ergonomics of general dentistry residents using different types of magnification (naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe). This study used randomized group allocation with fixed sequential design. Thirty general dentistry residents performed class II cavity preparations on plastic right mandibular first molars mounted in manikin using three types of magnification: naked eye, traditional loupe and deflection loupe. The posture was evaluated using the modified Posture Assessment Instrument (PAI). The cavity preparation quality scores, procedure time, posture scores were compared between groups using the Friedman test and Dunn’s tests with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons. Best cavity preparation quality was achieved by using deflection loupe (deflection loupe 79.9 ± 13.0 vs. naked eye 62.8 ± 6.7, p < 0.001;deflection loupe 79.9 ± 13.0 vs. traditional loupe 71.5 ± 9.9, p = 0.007). The procedure time of deflection loupe group was longer than the traditional loupe group (493.2 ± 190.8s vs. 333.6 ± 128.0s, p = 0.024). Deflection loupe group had better overall posture scores (naked eye 8.80 ± 0.81 vs. deflection loupe 7.47 ± 0.9, p < 0.001; traditional loupe 8.60 ± 0.86 vs. deflection loupe 7.47 ± 0.90, p = 0.002) and neck posture scores (deflection loupe 2.57 ± 0.68 vs. naked eye 3.87 ± 0.35, p < 0.001; deflection loupe 2.57 ± 0.68 vs. traditional loupe deflection loupe 3.50 ± 0.57, p < 0.001) . The findings of this study suggest that deflection loupes may offer ergonomic and quality advantages over the naked eye and traditional loupes in the context of cavity preparation. However, the prolonged procedure time observed with deflection loupes indicates a potential learning curve or slower initial adaptation.

BMC Oral Health
Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Occupational health in dentistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon