The Italian version of the benevolent childhood experiences scale: psychometric properties and incremental validity in predicting resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences

Positive childhood experiences are increasingly recognized as developmental resources that may promote psychological adaptation beyond the absence of adversity. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Benevolent Childhood Experiences Scale (BCEs) and its incremental contribution to resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). A community sample of 644 Italian adults (68.94% women; M_age = 28.22, SD = 9.78) completed the BCEs, ACE-Q, and Brief Resilience Scale. Item endorsement rates, internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance across gender, correlations, and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. Item endorsement was high, and a one-factor confirmatory factor analysis using WLSMV showed overall acceptable model fit. Internal consistency was moderate (KR-20 = 0.63; ω = 0.66), and gender invariance was partially supported. BCEs were negatively associated with ACEs and positively associated with resilience. In hierarchical regression analyses, BCEs made a small but statistically significant incremental contribution to the prediction of resilience beyond age, gender, and ACEs (ΔR² = 0.017). Findings provide initial support for the Italian BCEs as a brief measure of benevolent childhood experiences and suggest a modest incremental contribution of BCEs to perceived resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05841-3
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Italian version of the benevolent childhood experiences scale: psychometric properties and incremental validity in predicting resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences

Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino, Rossella Suriano, Francesca Felicia Operto, Antonio Aquino
4 links
BMC Psychology
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

The Italian version of the benevolent childhood experiences scale: psychometric properties and incremental validity in predicting resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences

Grazia Maria Giovanna Pastorino, Rossella Suriano, Francesca Felicia Operto, Antonio Aquino
article en

Abstract

Positive childhood experiences are increasingly recognized as developmental resources that may promote psychological adaptation beyond the absence of adversity. This study examined the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Benevolent Childhood Experiences Scale (BCEs) and its incremental contribution to resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences (ACEs). A community sample of 644 Italian adults (68.94% women; M_age = 28.22, SD = 9.78) completed the BCEs, ACE-Q, and Brief Resilience Scale. Item endorsement rates, internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance across gender, correlations, and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted. Item endorsement was high, and a one-factor confirmatory factor analysis using WLSMV showed overall acceptable model fit. Internal consistency was moderate (KR-20 = 0.63; ω = 0.66), and gender invariance was partially supported. BCEs were negatively associated with ACEs and positively associated with resilience. In hierarchical regression analyses, BCEs made a small but statistically significant incremental contribution to the prediction of resilience beyond age, gender, and ACEs (ΔR² = 0.017). Findings provide initial support for the Italian BCEs as a brief measure of benevolent childhood experiences and suggest a modest incremental contribution of BCEs to perceived resilience beyond adverse childhood experiences.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
Magna Graecia University (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon