How AI undermines the ethics of teaching

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, I argue that its integration is not a neutral enhancement but a socio-technical shift that often alienates educators from their labour, purpose, and professional relationships. Reframing the concept of alienation through critical theory, educational ethics, and data justice, I identify four ways in which AI estranges teachers: from their pedagogical outputs, their teaching processes, their vocational identity, and their social bonds. Engaging with recent developments in generative AI and emotion-sensing tools, I underline how these systems frequently reinforce logics of standardisation, surveillance, and commercialisation. In response, I propose a multidimensional framework for resistance, through policy reform, participatory design, and critical pedagogy, culminating in four ethical principles: epistemic humility, relational primacy, contextual adaptability, and democratic co-design. The paper calls for a reimagining of AI’s role in education, grounded not in technological inevitability but in moral responsibility and educational justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09503-y
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How AI undermines the ethics of teaching

Ahmet Küçükuncular
5 links
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Digital Education and Society
article

How AI undermines the ethics of teaching

Ahmet Küçükuncular
article en

Abstract

As AI becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, I argue that its integration is not a neutral enhancement but a socio-technical shift that often alienates educators from their labour, purpose, and professional relationships. Reframing the concept of alienation through critical theory, educational ethics, and data justice, I identify four ways in which AI estranges teachers: from their pedagogical outputs, their teaching processes, their vocational identity, and their social bonds. Engaging with recent developments in generative AI and emotion-sensing tools, I underline how these systems frequently reinforce logics of standardisation, surveillance, and commercialisation. In response, I propose a multidimensional framework for resistance, through policy reform, participatory design, and critical pedagogy, culminating in four ethical principles: epistemic humility, relational primacy, contextual adaptability, and democratic co-design. The paper calls for a reimagining of AI’s role in education, grounded not in technological inevitability but in moral responsibility and educational justice.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Near East University (CY)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon