The singular versus the plural readers of Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq

This article reads the narrative contract in Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq’s pivotal 1855 novel al-Sāq ʿalā al-sāq (Leg Over Leg). Borrowing from Barthes’s idea of narrative contract, I argue that the many narrator apostrophes to the reader do not relate to issues of plot, as in some fictions, but to test the reader’s endurance. In exchange, the reader gains a promised reward of philological mastery. Yet by the end of al-Sāq, the nature of the contract collapses. This authorial admission reflects the material reality of the text’s circulation at the time when al-Shidyāq was the freest and the least enmeshed in a larger structure of knowledge production. The article then pivots to the plural readers of al-Shidyāq’s newspaper al-Jawāʾib. While most scholarly attention has focused on al-Sāq, this essay opens onto broader questions of the newspaper-novel nexus and how nineteenth-century Arabic writing imagines its reading public and fosters such narrative contracts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Middle Eastern Literatures
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1475262x.2026.2756543
Primary Topic
Narrative Theory and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The singular versus the plural readers of Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq

Alfred Jeoffrey Naddaff
Middle Eastern Literatures
Narrative Theory and Analysis
article

The singular versus the plural readers of Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq

Alfred Jeoffrey Naddaff
article en

Abstract

This article reads the narrative contract in Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq’s pivotal 1855 novel al-Sāq ʿalā al-sāq (Leg Over Leg). Borrowing from Barthes’s idea of narrative contract, I argue that the many narrator apostrophes to the reader do not relate to issues of plot, as in some fictions, but to test the reader’s endurance. In exchange, the reader gains a promised reward of philological mastery. Yet by the end of al-Sāq, the nature of the contract collapses. This authorial admission reflects the material reality of the text’s circulation at the time when al-Shidyāq was the freest and the least enmeshed in a larger structure of knowledge production. The article then pivots to the plural readers of al-Shidyāq’s newspaper al-Jawāʾib. While most scholarly attention has focused on al-Sāq, this essay opens onto broader questions of the newspaper-novel nexus and how nineteenth-century Arabic writing imagines its reading public and fosters such narrative contracts.

Middle Eastern Literatures
Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Narrative Theory and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon