Effect of Oral Proprioceptive Stimuli on Auditory–Visual Integration

Abstract Proprioception contributes to body position, balance, movement control, sensory spatial localization and multisensory integration. Interactions between the stomatognathic and visual systems through trigeminal afferents have been demonstrated. This exploratory study investigated whether oral proprioceptive stimulation influences visual perception and modulates sound-induced visual changes under binocular dissociation. Thirty-eight healthy adults participated. The Vertical Maddox Test (VM), which induces binocular dissociation and increases reliance on ocular proprioception, assessed visual perception during four experimental phases: baseline without stimulation, sound stimulation, simultaneous sound and oral proprioceptive stimulation, and oral proprioceptive stimulation alone. Oral proprioceptive stimuli (OPS) comprised combined oral stimuli (COS), involving tongue and lip positions, and dental stimuli (DS), consisting of controlled pressure or traction applied to the incisors. None of the participants reported visual pseudo-scotomas (VS; i.e., small, transient visual losses) at baseline, whereas 89.5% (95% CI [75.9, 95.8]) reported VS under at least one experimental condition. VS was reported by 60.5% (95% CI [44.7, 74.4]) during sound stimulation and by 81.6% (95% CI [66.6, 90.8]) under at least one oral proprioceptive condition. Among participants with sound-induced VS, 78.3% (95% CI [58.1, 90.3]) achieved VS elimination with at least one oral proprioceptive stimulus while sound continued. Elimination was achieved with DS only in 21.7% (95% CI [9.7, 41.9]), with COS only in 8.7% (95% CI [2.4, 26.8]), and with both in 47.8% (95% CI [29.2, 67.0]). Among participants who responded to both stimulus types, complete, partial, and no concordance between anatomically equivalent stimulations were observed in 45.5% (95% CI [21.3, 72.0]), 45.5% (95% CI [21.3, 72.0]), and 9.1% (95% CI [1.6, 37.7]), respectively. These exploratory findings support functional sensory interactions between the visual and stomatognathic systems and suggest that oral proprioception may influence visual perception and modulate sound-induced visual changes. They also suggest broader oral sensory contributions to central sensory processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Multisensory Research
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-bja10224
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Effect of Oral Proprioceptive Stimuli on Auditory–Visual Integration

Patrick Quercia, Sophie Román-Richon, Meritxell Sánchez Molins, Marta Nosàs-García et al.
Multisensory Research
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Effect of Oral Proprioceptive Stimuli on Auditory–Visual Integration

Patrick Quercia, Sophie Román-Richon, Meritxell Sánchez Molins, Marta Nosàs-García, Agustí Vila-Frigola, Clàudia Velasco-Torrent
article en

Abstract

Abstract Proprioception contributes to body position, balance, movement control, sensory spatial localization and multisensory integration. Interactions between the stomatognathic and visual systems through trigeminal afferents have been demonstrated. This exploratory study investigated whether oral proprioceptive stimulation influences visual perception and modulates sound-induced visual changes under binocular dissociation. Thirty-eight healthy adults participated. The Vertical Maddox Test (VM), which induces binocular dissociation and increases reliance on ocular proprioception, assessed visual perception during four experimental phases: baseline without stimulation, sound stimulation, simultaneous sound and oral proprioceptive stimulation, and oral proprioceptive stimulation alone. Oral proprioceptive stimuli (OPS) comprised combined oral stimuli (COS), involving tongue and lip positions, and dental stimuli (DS), consisting of controlled pressure or traction applied to the incisors. None of the participants reported visual pseudo-scotomas (VS; i.e., small, transient visual losses) at baseline, whereas 89.5% (95% CI [75.9, 95.8]) reported VS under at least one experimental condition. VS was reported by 60.5% (95% CI [44.7, 74.4]) during sound stimulation and by 81.6% (95% CI [66.6, 90.8]) under at least one oral proprioceptive condition. Among participants with sound-induced VS, 78.3% (95% CI [58.1, 90.3]) achieved VS elimination with at least one oral proprioceptive stimulus while sound continued. Elimination was achieved with DS only in 21.7% (95% CI [9.7, 41.9]), with COS only in 8.7% (95% CI [2.4, 26.8]), and with both in 47.8% (95% CI [29.2, 67.0]). Among participants who responded to both stimulus types, complete, partial, and no concordance between anatomically equivalent stimulations were observed in 45.5% (95% CI [21.3, 72.0]), 45.5% (95% CI [21.3, 72.0]), and 9.1% (95% CI [1.6, 37.7]), respectively. These exploratory findings support functional sensory interactions between the visual and stomatognathic systems and suggest that oral proprioception may influence visual perception and modulate sound-induced visual changes. They also suggest broader oral sensory contributions to central sensory processing.

Multisensory Research
Inserm (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Cognition, Action, and Sensorimotor Plasticity (FR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon