Battery Energy Storage System carbon footprint: Mode-of-operation and supply-chain influence

This study presents a dynamic carbon footprint framework for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) by integrating dispatch-optimised modelling with regional supply-chain data. Three applications — energy arbitrage, demand response, and peak shaving — are evaluated across six European countries to compare two functional units: installed capacity ( k W h c a p a c i t y ) and net delivered energy ( k W h d e l i v e r e d ). Results demonstrate that BESS carbon footprints vary by over 300% depending on sizing, operational mode, and location. Operational impacts dominate in high-carbon grids, while production and recycling are primary drivers in low-carbon contexts. Critically, capacity-based metrics can incentivise oversizing, which often leads to underutilisation and poor performance when measured per unit of energy delivered. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that transportation contributes negligibly to the total life-cycle footprint. By providing a context-aware assessment methodology, this research supports informed procurement and regulatory compliance under the emerging EU Battery Regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109867
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Battery Energy Storage System carbon footprint: Mode-of-operation and supply-chain influence

Rafael Guédez, Farzin Golzar, Luka Smajila, Ketan Vaidya
4 links
Energy Reports
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Battery Energy Storage System carbon footprint: Mode-of-operation and supply-chain influence

Rafael Guédez, Farzin Golzar, Luka Smajila, Ketan Vaidya
article en

Abstract

This study presents a dynamic carbon footprint framework for Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) by integrating dispatch-optimised modelling with regional supply-chain data. Three applications — energy arbitrage, demand response, and peak shaving — are evaluated across six European countries to compare two functional units: installed capacity ( k W h c a p a c i t y ) and net delivered energy ( k W h d e l i v e r e d ). Results demonstrate that BESS carbon footprints vary by over 300% depending on sizing, operational mode, and location. Operational impacts dominate in high-carbon grids, while production and recycling are primary drivers in low-carbon contexts. Critically, capacity-based metrics can incentivise oversizing, which often leads to underutilisation and poor performance when measured per unit of energy delivered. Sensitivity analysis further reveals that transportation contributes negligibly to the total life-cycle footprint. By providing a context-aware assessment methodology, this research supports informed procurement and regulatory compliance under the emerging EU Battery Regulation.

Energy ReportsVol. 16
Northvolt (Sweden) (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Climate action, Affordable and clean energy, Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon