Age reshapes selection on melanoma driver mutations

Aging is a major risk factor for melanoma. However, it is unclear whether aging fuels tumor evolution by altering mutation rates, changing the microenvironmentally induced selection on drivers, or both. We analyzed 5472 melanomas, estimating how selection on individual variants changes with patient age while accounting for differing neutral mutation rates. Neutral mutation rates increased only modestly with age; ultraviolet damage remained predominant, but endogenous processes increasingly contributed to older tumors. In contrast, selection on major drivers was strongly age dependent: The advantage of BRAF V600E declined precipitously with age, whereas NRAS Q61 mutations gained advantage. TERT promoter mutations became more frequent, yet less advantageous. Aging therefore reshapes melanoma evolution primarily by altering selection, motivating age-conscious evaluation of clinical biomarkers and therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Advances
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeh1407
Primary Topic
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Age reshapes selection on melanoma driver mutations

Moein Rajaei, Douglas E. Brash, Jeffrey D. Mandell, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo et al.
1 links
Science Advances
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
article

Age reshapes selection on melanoma driver mutations

Moein Rajaei, Douglas E. Brash, Jeffrey D. Mandell, Jorge A. Alfaro-Murillo, Jeffrey P. Townsend, Yihan Liu
article en

Abstract

Aging is a major risk factor for melanoma. However, it is unclear whether aging fuels tumor evolution by altering mutation rates, changing the microenvironmentally induced selection on drivers, or both. We analyzed 5472 melanomas, estimating how selection on individual variants changes with patient age while accounting for differing neutral mutation rates. Neutral mutation rates increased only modestly with age; ultraviolet damage remained predominant, but endogenous processes increasingly contributed to older tumors. In contrast, selection on major drivers was strongly age dependent: The advantage of BRAF V600E declined precipitously with age, whereas NRAS Q61 mutations gained advantage. TERT promoter mutations became more frequent, yet less advantageous. Aging therefore reshapes melanoma evolution primarily by altering selection, motivating age-conscious evaluation of clinical biomarkers and therapies.

Science AdvancesVol. 12(45)
Yale Cancer Center (US), Universidad de Costa Rica (CR), Yale University (US)
Yale University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon