Evaluating the Delivery of a Remote Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Programme for People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage
INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee osteoarthritis can cause difficulty with daily activities and are particularly common in people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Supported self-management programmes, such as peer mentorship, can be a valuable way to support people to actively participate in managing their condition. The aim of this study was to develop, deliver and evaluate a remote peer mentorship programme to support self-management of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: The current study is a process evaluation of a complex intervention involving participants with diagnosed osteoarthritis and self-reported socioeconomic disadvantage. Prior to participating in the remote self-management programme, mentees completed a baseline questionnaire. Following programme completion, mentees and peer mentors were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview, with mentees also invited to a follow-up interview. Quantitative data from baseline questionnaires were analysed using descriptive statistics, and an inductive-deductive approach was undertaken to analyse qualitative data. Data were integrated through narrative using a contiguous approach. RESULTS: Thirty mentees participated in the remote peer mentorship programme, delivered by 13 trained peer mentors. Twenty-two mentees participated in an initial interview, 17 participated in a follow-up interview, and 12 peer mentors were interviewed. Four inter-related themes were developed that explored engagement, remote delivery, acceptability and self-management progress. The process evaluation identified factors that influenced engagement with the programme such as competing priorities, the role of the peer mentor, and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Remote peer mentorship for people with osteoarthritis experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage is largely acceptable, with the potential for meaningful impact.
Authors
- Gretl A. McHugh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5766-5885)
- Samantha J. Mason (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-8353)
- Anna M Anderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4048-6880)
- Heidi Green (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2796-6898)
- Mark T. Conner (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-8143)
- Elizabeth C. Lavender (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0226-8847)
- L. Eckersley
- Susan Barry
Institutions
- University of Leeds (GB)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Musculoskeletal Care
- Published
- 2026-11-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70297
- Primary Topic
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Nuffield Foundation
- Arthritis Research UK