Evaluating the Delivery of a Remote Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Programme for People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage

INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee osteoarthritis can cause difficulty with daily activities and are particularly common in people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Supported self-management programmes, such as peer mentorship, can be a valuable way to support people to actively participate in managing their condition. The aim of this study was to develop, deliver and evaluate a remote peer mentorship programme to support self-management of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: The current study is a process evaluation of a complex intervention involving participants with diagnosed osteoarthritis and self-reported socioeconomic disadvantage. Prior to participating in the remote self-management programme, mentees completed a baseline questionnaire. Following programme completion, mentees and peer mentors were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview, with mentees also invited to a follow-up interview. Quantitative data from baseline questionnaires were analysed using descriptive statistics, and an inductive-deductive approach was undertaken to analyse qualitative data. Data were integrated through narrative using a contiguous approach. RESULTS: Thirty mentees participated in the remote peer mentorship programme, delivered by 13 trained peer mentors. Twenty-two mentees participated in an initial interview, 17 participated in a follow-up interview, and 12 peer mentors were interviewed. Four inter-related themes were developed that explored engagement, remote delivery, acceptability and self-management progress. The process evaluation identified factors that influenced engagement with the programme such as competing priorities, the role of the peer mentor, and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Remote peer mentorship for people with osteoarthritis experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage is largely acceptable, with the potential for meaningful impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Musculoskeletal Care
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70297
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluating the Delivery of a Remote Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Programme for People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage

Gretl A. McHugh, Samantha J. Mason, Anna M Anderson, Heidi Green et al.
2 links
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Evaluating the Delivery of a Remote Osteoarthritis Peer Mentorship Programme for People Experiencing Socioeconomic Disadvantage

Gretl A. McHugh, Samantha J. Mason, Anna M Anderson, Heidi Green, Mark T. Conner, Elizabeth C. Lavender, L. Eckersley, Susan Barry
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hip and knee osteoarthritis can cause difficulty with daily activities and are particularly common in people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. Supported self-management programmes, such as peer mentorship, can be a valuable way to support people to actively participate in managing their condition. The aim of this study was to develop, deliver and evaluate a remote peer mentorship programme to support self-management of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis among people experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage. METHODS: The current study is a process evaluation of a complex intervention involving participants with diagnosed osteoarthritis and self-reported socioeconomic disadvantage. Prior to participating in the remote self-management programme, mentees completed a baseline questionnaire. Following programme completion, mentees and peer mentors were invited to take part in a semi-structured interview, with mentees also invited to a follow-up interview. Quantitative data from baseline questionnaires were analysed using descriptive statistics, and an inductive-deductive approach was undertaken to analyse qualitative data. Data were integrated through narrative using a contiguous approach. RESULTS: Thirty mentees participated in the remote peer mentorship programme, delivered by 13 trained peer mentors. Twenty-two mentees participated in an initial interview, 17 participated in a follow-up interview, and 12 peer mentors were interviewed. Four inter-related themes were developed that explored engagement, remote delivery, acceptability and self-management progress. The process evaluation identified factors that influenced engagement with the programme such as competing priorities, the role of the peer mentor, and motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Remote peer mentorship for people with osteoarthritis experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage is largely acceptable, with the potential for meaningful impact.

Musculoskeletal CareVol. 24(4)
University of Leeds (GB), National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
Nuffield Foundation, Arthritis Research UK
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon