The Legal Framework Governing Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Analytical Study

The increasing reliance on digital technologies in the commission and investigation of crime has made digital evidence integral to contemporary criminal proceedings, while raising complex questions concerning its admissibility, reliability, and compatibility with fair-trial guarantees. This study examines the adequacy of the legal regulation of digital evidence in criminal proceedings and the extent to which it reconciles effective criminal investigation with the protection of fundamental rights. Employing descriptive-analytical, comparative, and inductive approaches, it analyses the legal nature of digital evidence, the procedures governing its collection, seizure, preservation, and examination, and the principles guiding its judicial assessment. The study considers selected Arab and international legal frameworks, with particular attention to the United Arab Emirates, and addresses the challenges of obtaining electronic data across national borders. The findings indicate that contemporary legal systems increasingly recognise digital evidence as a legitimate means of criminal proof. The principal challenge lies not in recognition alone, but in safeguarding the legality, integrity, and verifiability of such evidence throughout its lifecycle. A documented chain of custody and competent forensic examination are central to establishing reliability, while the ultimate assessment of probative value remains within the discretion of the criminal court. The study therefore recommends clearer procedural rules specifically tailored to digital evidence, standardised custody and preservation practices, professional standards for forensic expertise, and stronger mechanisms for international judicial cooperation. It concludes that an effective legal framework must integrate technical safeguards with procedural protections to strengthen criminal justice without undermining privacy, defence rights, or the fairness of proceedings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Management & Humanities
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63108/ijlmh.13188
Primary Topic
Education, Law, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Legal Framework Governing Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Analytical Study

Aadel Abdulla Ali Alyammahi
3 links
International Journal of Law Management & Humanities
Education, Law, and Society
article

The Legal Framework Governing Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: A Comparative Analytical Study

Aadel Abdulla Ali Alyammahi
article en

Abstract

The increasing reliance on digital technologies in the commission and investigation of crime has made digital evidence integral to contemporary criminal proceedings, while raising complex questions concerning its admissibility, reliability, and compatibility with fair-trial guarantees. This study examines the adequacy of the legal regulation of digital evidence in criminal proceedings and the extent to which it reconciles effective criminal investigation with the protection of fundamental rights. Employing descriptive-analytical, comparative, and inductive approaches, it analyses the legal nature of digital evidence, the procedures governing its collection, seizure, preservation, and examination, and the principles guiding its judicial assessment. The study considers selected Arab and international legal frameworks, with particular attention to the United Arab Emirates, and addresses the challenges of obtaining electronic data across national borders. The findings indicate that contemporary legal systems increasingly recognise digital evidence as a legitimate means of criminal proof. The principal challenge lies not in recognition alone, but in safeguarding the legality, integrity, and verifiability of such evidence throughout its lifecycle. A documented chain of custody and competent forensic examination are central to establishing reliability, while the ultimate assessment of probative value remains within the discretion of the criminal court. The study therefore recommends clearer procedural rules specifically tailored to digital evidence, standardised custody and preservation practices, professional standards for forensic expertise, and stronger mechanisms for international judicial cooperation. It concludes that an effective legal framework must integrate technical safeguards with procedural protections to strengthen criminal justice without undermining privacy, defence rights, or the fairness of proceedings.

International Journal of Law Management & HumanitiesVol. 9(VI)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Education, Law, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon