Dynamical Drivers of Interannual Variability in OMI Stratospheric NO 2 Revealed by Machine Learning

Abstract Stratospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry and serves as an indirect indicator of dynamical variability in the stratosphere. However, the drivers of its interannual variability remain incompletely quantified. In this study, we analyze two decades (2005–2024) of monthly anomalies in stratospheric‐dominated total column NO 2 observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board NASA Aura satellite. We first evaluate the stratospheric NO 2 from the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Multi‐Decadal Nitrogen Dioxide and Derived Products from Satellite (MINDS) simulation with the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry and show that it reproduces the observed spatial patterns and interannual variability of OMI stratospheric NO 2 column. This good model‐observation agreement supports the use of GMI‐derived dynamical diagnostics, including tropopause pressure and surface pressure, as physically informed predictors. Using these predictors together with seven major atmospheric and oceanic variability indices, the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in particular, we compare traditional multi‐linear regression with a machine learning (ML) approach based on gradient‐boosted decision trees. The ML framework substantially improves the reconstruction of OMI NO 2 interannual variability in the stratosphere, indicating the importance of nonlinear relationships and interactions among dynamical drivers. The interpretable ML analysis further reveals that tropopause pressure, QBO, and ENSO are dominant drivers of stratospheric NO 2 variability, with clear latitudinal dependence and distinct lagged influences across regions. These results provide new quantitative insight into the dynamical controls on observed stratospheric NO 2 variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026jd047752
Primary Topic
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Dynamical Drivers of Interannual Variability in OMI Stratospheric NO 2 Revealed by Machine Learning

Bradford L. Fisher, Sergey V. Marchenko, Eric J. Bucsela, Lok N. Lamsal et al.
3 links
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
article

Dynamical Drivers of Interannual Variability in OMI Stratospheric NO 2 Revealed by Machine Learning

Bradford L. Fisher, Sergey V. Marchenko, Eric J. Bucsela, Lok N. Lamsal, Luke D. Oman, N. A. Krotkov, Can Li, Junhua Liu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Stratospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) plays an important role in atmospheric chemistry and serves as an indirect indicator of dynamical variability in the stratosphere. However, the drivers of its interannual variability remain incompletely quantified. In this study, we analyze two decades (2005–2024) of monthly anomalies in stratospheric‐dominated total column NO 2 observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on board NASA Aura satellite. We first evaluate the stratospheric NO 2 from the NASA Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Multi‐Decadal Nitrogen Dioxide and Derived Products from Satellite (MINDS) simulation with the Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry and show that it reproduces the observed spatial patterns and interannual variability of OMI stratospheric NO 2 column. This good model‐observation agreement supports the use of GMI‐derived dynamical diagnostics, including tropopause pressure and surface pressure, as physically informed predictors. Using these predictors together with seven major atmospheric and oceanic variability indices, the Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and the El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) in particular, we compare traditional multi‐linear regression with a machine learning (ML) approach based on gradient‐boosted decision trees. The ML framework substantially improves the reconstruction of OMI NO 2 interannual variability in the stratosphere, indicating the importance of nonlinear relationships and interactions among dynamical drivers. The interpretable ML analysis further reveals that tropopause pressure, QBO, and ENSO are dominant drivers of stratospheric NO 2 variability, with clear latitudinal dependence and distinct lagged influences across regions. These results provide new quantitative insight into the dynamical controls on observed stratospheric NO 2 variability.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 131(21)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), United States Department of the Interior (US), Science and Technology Corporation (United States) (US), Adnet Systems (United States) (US), Morgan State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon