Many-objective reservoir operation optimization using NSGA-III and decision-support analysis: a sustainable management framework for the Indira Sagar Reservoir, India

Abstract Efficient reservoir operation requires simultaneous consideration of competing goals related to hydropower generation, water-supply reliability, flood management, and storage regulation. However, deriving balanced operating policies becomes increasingly complex when several conflicting objectives are considered concurrently. This study develops a many-objective optimization framework for the Indira Sagar Reservoir, India, considering four objectives: maximization of hydropower generation and minimization of water deficit, spill losses, and storage deviation. The reservoir operation model integrates hydrological inputs, demand characteristics, operational constraints, and reservoir continuity relationships. Five metaheuristic algorithms Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III), Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), Multi-Objective Ant Colony Optimization (MOACO), and Multi-Objective Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (MOTLBO were comparatively evaluated using Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and computational performance indicators. NSGA-III achieved an HV of 0.9234 and an IGD of 0.0338, demonstrating effective convergence and diversity for the evaluated solutions. Pareto analysis revealed distinct trade-offs among energy generation, water shortage, spill, and storage regulation. The Weighted Sum Method (WSM) identified Solution S10 as the selected compromise policy, providing 4106.8 GWh/year hydropower generation, 352.9 MCM/year water deficit, and 92.3% reliability. Scenario-based evaluation under normal, flood, and drought conditions further demonstrated variations in policy performance across hydrological regimes. The framework provides a structured decision-support approach for strategic reservoir operation and facilitates transparent evaluation of trade-offs among competing water-resource objectives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-026-01307-w
Primary Topic
Water resources management and optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Many-objective reservoir operation optimization using NSGA-III and decision-support analysis: a sustainable management framework for the Indira Sagar Reservoir, India

Ruchir Lashkari, Shilpa Tripathi, Ashwin Parihar
1 links
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Water resources management and optimization
article

Many-objective reservoir operation optimization using NSGA-III and decision-support analysis: a sustainable management framework for the Indira Sagar Reservoir, India

Ruchir Lashkari, Shilpa Tripathi, Ashwin Parihar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Efficient reservoir operation requires simultaneous consideration of competing goals related to hydropower generation, water-supply reliability, flood management, and storage regulation. However, deriving balanced operating policies becomes increasingly complex when several conflicting objectives are considered concurrently. This study develops a many-objective optimization framework for the Indira Sagar Reservoir, India, considering four objectives: maximization of hydropower generation and minimization of water deficit, spill losses, and storage deviation. The reservoir operation model integrates hydrological inputs, demand characteristics, operational constraints, and reservoir continuity relationships. Five metaheuristic algorithms Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III (NSGA-III), Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO), Multi-Objective Ant Colony Optimization (MOACO), and Multi-Objective Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (MOTLBO were comparatively evaluated using Hypervolume (HV), Inverted Generational Distance (IGD), and computational performance indicators. NSGA-III achieved an HV of 0.9234 and an IGD of 0.0338, demonstrating effective convergence and diversity for the evaluated solutions. Pareto analysis revealed distinct trade-offs among energy generation, water shortage, spill, and storage regulation. The Weighted Sum Method (WSM) identified Solution S10 as the selected compromise policy, providing 4106.8 GWh/year hydropower generation, 352.9 MCM/year water deficit, and 92.3% reliability. Scenario-based evaluation under normal, flood, and drought conditions further demonstrated variations in policy performance across hydrological regimes. The framework provides a structured decision-support approach for strategic reservoir operation and facilitates transparent evaluation of trade-offs among competing water-resource objectives.

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 73(1)
Clean water and sanitation, Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Water resources management and optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon