Teacher-student interaction, technology integration, and university students’ self-perceived academic success in lahore: the role of student engagement

Teacher-student interaction and technology integration are important features of contemporary higher education. However, their relationships with students’ self-perceived academic success may differ when examined together. The role of student engagement in these relationships also remains unclear. This study examined the associations among teacher-student interaction, technology integration, student engagement, and university students’ self-perceived academic success in Pakistan. It also tested whether student engagement was associated with the indirect pathways between the two predictors and academic success. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 668 university students from ten universities in Lahore, Pakistan. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Jamovi. An integrated mediation model was tested with teacher-student interaction and technology integration entered simultaneously. Direct, total, and indirect effects were estimated using 5,000 bootstrap samples. Teacher-student interaction was positively associated with student engagement, and technology integration was also positively associated with student engagement. However, teacher-student interaction was not significantly associated with self-perceived academic success. Technology integration showed a significant positive association with self-perceived academic success in the primary model, but this association became small and non-significant after overlapping items were removed in a sensitivity analysis. Student engagement was not significantly associated with academic success. Neither the indirect association between teacher-student interaction and academic success through student engagement nor the indirect association between technology integration and academic success through student engagement was significant. The findings provide limited support for the proposed model. Technology integration was positively associated with self-perceived academic success, but teacher-student interaction was not. Student engagement did not explain either relationship. The findings suggest that social interaction and technology may relate to students’ learning experiences through different pathways. Universities should not assume that increasing teacher-student interaction or technology use will automatically improve students’ perceived academic success. Technology should be integrated with clear learning purposes, while teacher-student interaction should be examined together with other academic and contextual factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SN Social Sciences
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-026-01909-4
Primary Topic
Higher Education Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Teacher-student interaction, technology integration, and university students’ self-perceived academic success in lahore: the role of student engagement

Zuwati Hasim, Sarfraz Aslam, Atif Saleem, Shamim Akhter et al.
1 links
SN Social Sciences
Higher Education Research Studies
article

Teacher-student interaction, technology integration, and university students’ self-perceived academic success in lahore: the role of student engagement

Zuwati Hasim, Sarfraz Aslam, Atif Saleem, Shamim Akhter, Amjad Islam Amjad, Laiba Ejaz
article en

Abstract

Teacher-student interaction and technology integration are important features of contemporary higher education. However, their relationships with students’ self-perceived academic success may differ when examined together. The role of student engagement in these relationships also remains unclear. This study examined the associations among teacher-student interaction, technology integration, student engagement, and university students’ self-perceived academic success in Pakistan. It also tested whether student engagement was associated with the indirect pathways between the two predictors and academic success. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 668 university students from ten universities in Lahore, Pakistan. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Jamovi. An integrated mediation model was tested with teacher-student interaction and technology integration entered simultaneously. Direct, total, and indirect effects were estimated using 5,000 bootstrap samples. Teacher-student interaction was positively associated with student engagement, and technology integration was also positively associated with student engagement. However, teacher-student interaction was not significantly associated with self-perceived academic success. Technology integration showed a significant positive association with self-perceived academic success in the primary model, but this association became small and non-significant after overlapping items were removed in a sensitivity analysis. Student engagement was not significantly associated with academic success. Neither the indirect association between teacher-student interaction and academic success through student engagement nor the indirect association between technology integration and academic success through student engagement was significant. The findings provide limited support for the proposed model. Technology integration was positively associated with self-perceived academic success, but teacher-student interaction was not. Student engagement did not explain either relationship. The findings suggest that social interaction and technology may relate to students’ learning experiences through different pathways. Universities should not assume that increasing teacher-student interaction or technology use will automatically improve students’ perceived academic success. Technology should be integrated with clear learning purposes, while teacher-student interaction should be examined together with other academic and contextual factors.

SN Social SciencesVol. 6(11)
INTI International University (MY), University of Lahore (PK), University of Limerick (IE), University of Malaya (MY), UNITAR International University (MY), Unicaf University (MW)
INTI International University and Colleges
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Higher Education Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon