The Influence of AI Tools in Academic Legal Journal Publications in South Africa

This article investigates the influence of generative AI tools, particularly large language models, on academic legal writing published in South Africa between 2017 and 2024. The study employs a longitudinal analysis of 2,129 peer-reviewed legal journal articles. Thereafter, it uses a combination of linguistic markers, statistical testing and AI-detection tools to evaluate shifts in writing style and structure. While subtle indicators of hybrid authorship emerged from 2022 onward, the findings reveal minimal AI-generated content and no evidence of complete AI-authored legal scholarship in the journals/publications evaluated. The article further explores the limitations of existing detection tools and raises concerns about transparency, disclosure practices, and the ethical implications of unacknowledged AI assistance. It recommends regulatory reforms for legal journals, academic institutions, and promotion systems to preserve authorship integrity and educational accountability in an evolving scholarly landscape.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2026/v29i0a22230
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Influence of AI Tools in Academic Legal Journal Publications in South Africa

Arthur van Coller
1 links
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

The Influence of AI Tools in Academic Legal Journal Publications in South Africa

Arthur van Coller
article en

Abstract

This article investigates the influence of generative AI tools, particularly large language models, on academic legal writing published in South Africa between 2017 and 2024. The study employs a longitudinal analysis of 2,129 peer-reviewed legal journal articles. Thereafter, it uses a combination of linguistic markers, statistical testing and AI-detection tools to evaluate shifts in writing style and structure. While subtle indicators of hybrid authorship emerged from 2022 onward, the findings reveal minimal AI-generated content and no evidence of complete AI-authored legal scholarship in the journals/publications evaluated. The article further explores the limitations of existing detection tools and raises concerns about transparency, disclosure practices, and the ethical implications of unacknowledged AI assistance. It recommends regulatory reforms for legal journals, academic institutions, and promotion systems to preserve authorship integrity and educational accountability in an evolving scholarly landscape.

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese RegsbladVol. 29
University of Fort Hare (ZA)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Influence of AI Tools in Academic Legal Journal Publications in South Africa — Arthur van Coller · Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS