Urban traffic fines: disciplining dangerous or vulnerable road users?

While research on traffic policing is dominated by technical studies in the field of traffic safety, critical accounts show that traffic laws are socially constructed and selectively enforced. Based on an analysis of traffic fines in Barcelona for the years 2022–24, our article assesses and reflects on the equity of traffic enforcement strategies across transport modes. In the context of policing campaigns targeting cyclists and e-scooters, we examine whether these two transport modes are overrepresented in traffic fines relative to their trip volumes and involvement in traffic crashes. Our findings show that cyclists and especially e-scooters are overrepresented compared to motorists if we only look at manually issued fines, accounting for 32% of fines despite representing only 13% of trips and 13% of vehicles involved in traffic crashes; however, if we include automated fines cars become the most fined vehicles relative to trip volumes and crash involvement. In addition, the average amount for fines issued to cyclists and e-scooters is much higher than for car drivers and motorcyclists. These monetary disparities, we suggest, raise important questions regarding fairness in the treatment of traffic violations between transport modes, hinting at a motonormative bias in existing traffic legislation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Safety Research
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55329/uqvx5982
Primary Topic
Traffic and Road Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Urban traffic fines: disciplining dangerous or vulnerable road users?

Samuel Nello‐Deakin, Guillem Viñas Salvador
Traffic Safety Research
Traffic and Road Safety
article

Urban traffic fines: disciplining dangerous or vulnerable road users?

Samuel Nello‐Deakin, Guillem Viñas Salvador
article en

Abstract

While research on traffic policing is dominated by technical studies in the field of traffic safety, critical accounts show that traffic laws are socially constructed and selectively enforced. Based on an analysis of traffic fines in Barcelona for the years 2022–24, our article assesses and reflects on the equity of traffic enforcement strategies across transport modes. In the context of policing campaigns targeting cyclists and e-scooters, we examine whether these two transport modes are overrepresented in traffic fines relative to their trip volumes and involvement in traffic crashes. Our findings show that cyclists and especially e-scooters are overrepresented compared to motorists if we only look at manually issued fines, accounting for 32% of fines despite representing only 13% of trips and 13% of vehicles involved in traffic crashes; however, if we include automated fines cars become the most fined vehicles relative to trip volumes and crash involvement. In addition, the average amount for fines issued to cyclists and e-scooters is much higher than for car drivers and motorcyclists. These monetary disparities, we suggest, raise important questions regarding fairness in the treatment of traffic violations between transport modes, hinting at a motonormative bias in existing traffic legislation.

Traffic Safety ResearchVol. 10
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Traffic and Road Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Urban traffic fines: disciplining dangerous or vulnerable road users? — Samuel Nello‐Deakin, Guillem Viñas Salvador · Traffic Safety Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS