Moving boundary thermo-hydro-mechanical model for perforation-controlled multi-fracture propagation

Multi-cluster hydraulic fracturing couples fracture interaction and nonuniform fluid allocation with transient cooling of the surrounding formation. This study evaluates fracture competition and its thermal consequences using a sequential moving-boundary framework: a displacement-discontinuity hydro-mechanical model provides fracture geometry, aperture, flow rate, and exposure time, after which rock and fracture-fluid temperatures are calculated on the evolving fracture mesh. The model accounts for evolving fracture geometry and nonlinear leakoff, and its thermal component is validated against the Dysart–Whitsitt analytical solution. Three, four, and five-cluster systems are simulated under uniform and differentiated completion designs. Uniform perforation causes progressive edge-fracture dominance as cluster density increases, leading to strong localization of fracture volume, fluid intake, and reservoir cooling. In the five-cluster case, the final-flow and cooling-area coefficients of variation reach 86% and 55%, respectively. A differentiated design combining nonuniform cluster spacing with higher perforation resistance at edge clusters and lower resistance at internal clusters converts unstable flow capture into bounded dynamic redistribution. For five clusters, this strategy reduces the corresponding coefficients of variation to 21.2% and 11.9%, while restoring the hydraulic and thermal contributions of the internal fractures. Among the investigated cases, four differentiated clusters provide the best compromise between total fracture extent, cooled reservoir contact, and injected-volume efficiency, whereas three clusters provide the highest geometric uniformity and fracture-volume conversion. These results demonstrate that cluster number should be optimized jointly with injection capacity, stress-shadow intensity, cluster spacing, and perforation resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2026.108707
Primary Topic
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Moving boundary thermo-hydro-mechanical model for perforation-controlled multi-fracture propagation

Zhaoying Chen, Quan Li, Yunliang Li, Yanfu Li et al.
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
article

Moving boundary thermo-hydro-mechanical model for perforation-controlled multi-fracture propagation

Zhaoying Chen, Quan Li, Yunliang Li, Yanfu Li, Shanqing Zhao, Jin Zhao, Hengdong Ye
article en

Abstract

Multi-cluster hydraulic fracturing couples fracture interaction and nonuniform fluid allocation with transient cooling of the surrounding formation. This study evaluates fracture competition and its thermal consequences using a sequential moving-boundary framework: a displacement-discontinuity hydro-mechanical model provides fracture geometry, aperture, flow rate, and exposure time, after which rock and fracture-fluid temperatures are calculated on the evolving fracture mesh. The model accounts for evolving fracture geometry and nonlinear leakoff, and its thermal component is validated against the Dysart–Whitsitt analytical solution. Three, four, and five-cluster systems are simulated under uniform and differentiated completion designs. Uniform perforation causes progressive edge-fracture dominance as cluster density increases, leading to strong localization of fracture volume, fluid intake, and reservoir cooling. In the five-cluster case, the final-flow and cooling-area coefficients of variation reach 86% and 55%, respectively. A differentiated design combining nonuniform cluster spacing with higher perforation resistance at edge clusters and lower resistance at internal clusters converts unstable flow capture into bounded dynamic redistribution. For five clusters, this strategy reduces the corresponding coefficients of variation to 21.2% and 11.9%, while restoring the hydraulic and thermal contributions of the internal fractures. Among the investigated cases, four differentiated clusters provide the best compromise between total fracture extent, cooled reservoir contact, and injected-volume efficiency, whereas three clusters provide the highest geometric uniformity and fracture-volume conversion. These results demonstrate that cluster number should be optimized jointly with injection capacity, stress-shadow intensity, cluster spacing, and perforation resistance.

Case Studies in Thermal EngineeringVol. 88
Yangtze University (CN), State Key Laboratory of Co-mining of Coal and Coal-Bed Methane (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon