Turkish adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the entrepreneurship scale for nursing students

To adapt to changing healthcare conditions and develop innovative solutions, nurses need entrepreneurial skills. Assessing the entrepreneurship levels of nursing students is important for informing educational programs and supporting research in nursing education. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt the Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties. This methodological study was conducted with 300 nursing students at a state university between October and December 2025. The 25-item Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students was adapted into Turkish through forward translation, back translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing to ensure linguistic and cultural appropriateness. Content validity was evaluated by five experts, and item-level and scale-level content validity indices (I-CVI and S-CVI) were calculated. Construct validity was examined using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test, Bartlett’s test of sphericity, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the original 25-item, four-factor model. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, corrected item–total correlations, and test–retest analysis. The I-CVI values ranged from 0.80 to 1.00, and the S-CVI was 0.98. The KMO value was 0.945, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ²=4000.349, p < 0.001). CFA indicated an acceptable fit of the original 25-item, four-factor model, with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.430 to 0.770 (χ²/df = 2.88, RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.057, and RMR = 0.036). The total-scale Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.943 and McDonald’s omega was 0.942, although the Risk Acceptance subscale showed comparatively lower internal consistency (α = 0.615, ω = 0.615). The test–retest ICC for the total scale was 0.972. Convergent and discriminant validity were not fully supported, as AVE values were below 0.50 and the Fornell–Larcker criterion was not fully satisfied. The Turkish version of the Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students demonstrated promising psychometric properties and an acceptable fit to the original four-factor model in the present sample. However, the lower reliability of the Risk Acceptance subscale and limitations in convergent and discriminant validity warrant cautious interpretation. Further validation in larger, multicentre, and more diverse nursing student populations is recommended before broader application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76853-7
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Turkish adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the entrepreneurship scale for nursing students

Didem Coşkun Şimşek, Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan, Mizgin Demir
6 links
Scientific Reports
Health Education and Validation
article

Turkish adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the entrepreneurship scale for nursing students

Didem Coşkun Şimşek, Gülcan Bahçecioğlu Turan, Mizgin Demir
article en

Abstract

To adapt to changing healthcare conditions and develop innovative solutions, nurses need entrepreneurial skills. Assessing the entrepreneurship levels of nursing students is important for informing educational programs and supporting research in nursing education. Therefore, this study aimed to adapt the Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties. This methodological study was conducted with 300 nursing students at a state university between October and December 2025. The 25-item Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students was adapted into Turkish through forward translation, back translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing to ensure linguistic and cultural appropriateness. Content validity was evaluated by five experts, and item-level and scale-level content validity indices (I-CVI and S-CVI) were calculated. Construct validity was examined using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test, Bartlett’s test of sphericity, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the original 25-item, four-factor model. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha, McDonald’s omega, corrected item–total correlations, and test–retest analysis. The I-CVI values ranged from 0.80 to 1.00, and the S-CVI was 0.98. The KMO value was 0.945, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was statistically significant (χ²=4000.349, p < 0.001). CFA indicated an acceptable fit of the original 25-item, four-factor model, with standardized factor loadings ranging from 0.430 to 0.770 (χ²/df = 2.88, RMSEA = 0.078, CFI = 0.97, TLI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.057, and RMR = 0.036). The total-scale Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.943 and McDonald’s omega was 0.942, although the Risk Acceptance subscale showed comparatively lower internal consistency (α = 0.615, ω = 0.615). The test–retest ICC for the total scale was 0.972. Convergent and discriminant validity were not fully supported, as AVE values were below 0.50 and the Fornell–Larcker criterion was not fully satisfied. The Turkish version of the Entrepreneurship Scale for Nursing Students demonstrated promising psychometric properties and an acceptable fit to the original four-factor model in the present sample. However, the lower reliability of the Risk Acceptance subscale and limitations in convergent and discriminant validity warrant cautious interpretation. Further validation in larger, multicentre, and more diverse nursing student populations is recommended before broader application.

Scientific Reports
Fırat University (TR)
Decent work and economic growth, Good health and well-being, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon