A benchmarking framework for organoid computing

Organoid computing leverages functional neural networks of lab-grown neural organoids to recapitulate key aspects of human brain information processing, holding promising potential in brain-inspired computing, brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience, and medicine. However, its broad application remains constrained due to technical limitations including biological variability, interface instability, stochastic performance, and limited reproducibility. Here, we present a benchmarking framework that systematically quantifies the key performance determinants of organoid computing. We operationally define ‘benchmark-ready’ organoid substrates using optional criteria encompassing viability, cellular identity, structural integrity, functional maturation, and baseline networks, supported by multimodal phenotyping. We further establish qualification metrics for organoid-machine interface and intrinsic neural and network function, including physical coupling, spatial coverage, temporal stability, spontaneous activity, and network-level organization. Finally, we introduce a hierarchical evaluation framework for stimulation-evoked computation combined with information encoding criteria, standardized scoring, and statistical reporting. We believe that the benchmarking framework may provide an adaptable foundation for standardized, reproducible and comparable evaluation of organoid computing technologies, thereby facilitating the broad adoption and application of organoid intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioactive Materials
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.10.027
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A benchmarking framework for organoid computing

Ken Mackie, Feng Guo, Huiyu Chu, Jason H. Tchieu et al.
2 links
Bioactive Materials
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
article

A benchmarking framework for organoid computing

Ken Mackie, Feng Guo, Huiyu Chu, Jason H. Tchieu, Yantao Xing, Chunhui Tian, Zichen Hong, Hongwei Cai, Yang Yang, Po-Yu Liang, Yi Gao, Mingxia Gu
article en

Abstract

Organoid computing leverages functional neural networks of lab-grown neural organoids to recapitulate key aspects of human brain information processing, holding promising potential in brain-inspired computing, brain-computer interfaces, neuroscience, and medicine. However, its broad application remains constrained due to technical limitations including biological variability, interface instability, stochastic performance, and limited reproducibility. Here, we present a benchmarking framework that systematically quantifies the key performance determinants of organoid computing. We operationally define ‘benchmark-ready’ organoid substrates using optional criteria encompassing viability, cellular identity, structural integrity, functional maturation, and baseline networks, supported by multimodal phenotyping. We further establish qualification metrics for organoid-machine interface and intrinsic neural and network function, including physical coupling, spatial coverage, temporal stability, spontaneous activity, and network-level organization. Finally, we introduce a hierarchical evaluation framework for stimulation-evoked computation combined with information encoding criteria, standardized scoring, and statistical reporting. We believe that the benchmarking framework may provide an adaptable foundation for standardized, reproducible and comparable evaluation of organoid computing technologies, thereby facilitating the broad adoption and application of organoid intelligence.

Bioactive MaterialsVol. 70
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University (US), University of Cincinnati (US)
National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon