Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence and Predictors of Adherence in Department of Energy Workers

Objective: To assess colorectal cancer screening (CRC) practices in Department of Energy (DOE) workers enrolled in an occupational medical screening program. Methods: A telephone survey adapted from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2020 questionnaire, addressing CRC screening history and CRC high risk conditions, was administered to participants aged 45–85 years, over 4 months in 2023. CRC screening adherence was reported as frequencies and percentages, and predictors of adherence as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall, 823 (81%) of 1015 respondents reported a CRC screening history adherent to United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Age [45–59 years: AOR: 0.3 (0.2, 0.6), 60–69 years: AOR: 0.8 (0.5, 1.3), >75 years: AOR: 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) vs. 70–75 years], being high-risk for CRC [AOR: 2.6 (1.4, 5.0)], and geographic region of residence [South AOR: 2.0 (1.3, 2.9), Midwest AOR: 1.3 (0.8, 2.2), and East AOR: 3.3 (0.4, 26.4) vs. West] were associated with adherence to USPSTF CRC screening guidelines. Conclusion: Lower adherence to CRC screening recommendations among younger workers who are experiencing an increasing incidence in CRC offers occupational medicine programs an excellent opportunity to encourage CRC screening adherence among younger workers and thereby decrease the morbidity associated with colorectal cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Work and Health
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/wah.2026.100025
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence and Predictors of Adherence in Department of Energy Workers

Khaula Khatlani, H Thompson, Jonathan Corbin
Work and Health
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence and Predictors of Adherence in Department of Energy Workers

Khaula Khatlani, H Thompson, Jonathan Corbin
article en

Abstract

Objective: To assess colorectal cancer screening (CRC) practices in Department of Energy (DOE) workers enrolled in an occupational medical screening program. Methods: A telephone survey adapted from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2020 questionnaire, addressing CRC screening history and CRC high risk conditions, was administered to participants aged 45–85 years, over 4 months in 2023. CRC screening adherence was reported as frequencies and percentages, and predictors of adherence as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall, 823 (81%) of 1015 respondents reported a CRC screening history adherent to United States Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines. Age [45–59 years: AOR: 0.3 (0.2, 0.6), 60–69 years: AOR: 0.8 (0.5, 1.3), >75 years: AOR: 0.5 (0.3, 0.9) vs. 70–75 years], being high-risk for CRC [AOR: 2.6 (1.4, 5.0)], and geographic region of residence [South AOR: 2.0 (1.3, 2.9), Midwest AOR: 1.3 (0.8, 2.2), and East AOR: 3.3 (0.4, 26.4) vs. West] were associated with adherence to USPSTF CRC screening guidelines. Conclusion: Lower adherence to CRC screening recommendations among younger workers who are experiencing an increasing incidence in CRC offers occupational medicine programs an excellent opportunity to encourage CRC screening adherence among younger workers and thereby decrease the morbidity associated with colorectal cancer.

Work and HealthVol. 2(4)
Queens College, CUNY (US), City University of New York (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon