The Economic Impact of Paediatric Integrated Care in Primary Care: A Rapid Review

Background: Health systems face mounting pressure to deliver equitable, cost-effective care amid rising disease burden and healthcare costs. Escalating paediatric out of pocket costs and other barriers to access, highlight the need for innovative care models. While integrated care shows promise for paediatric condition management, economic evidence remains limited. Methods: Searches were conducted between 2010 to 2025 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL using search terms “integrated care”, “paediatrics”, “primary care” and “cost-effectiveness”. Studies were included if they reported a cost-related outcome of a paediatric integrated care program delivered in primary care. Studies were assessed for methodological reporting quality using the CHEERS guideline. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions comprised care coordination models (n = 4), MDT-based care (n = 3) and co-consultation models (n = 2). Seven studies reported a favourable economic outcome with six being cost-effective, and one showing cost-savings. Care coordination models showed the strongest evidence for economic impact and clinical effectiveness. Conclusion: Integrated paediatric primary care models, particularly care coordination models, are economically favourable. Complex systems-level interventions show limited financial benefits; however, they are difficult to evaluate without understanding the local context of the intervention. Future research should prioritise improving the quality of economic evaluations and inclusion of societal perspectives into economic evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Integrated Care
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.10232
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Economic Impact of Paediatric Integrated Care in Primary Care: A Rapid Review

Raghu Lingam, Lena Amanda Sanci, Harriet Hiscock, Sandra K. Davidson et al.
International Journal of Integrated Care
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

The Economic Impact of Paediatric Integrated Care in Primary Care: A Rapid Review

Raghu Lingam, Lena Amanda Sanci, Harriet Hiscock, Sandra K. Davidson, Ann-Maree Duncan, Hamish McCartney
article en

Abstract

Background: Health systems face mounting pressure to deliver equitable, cost-effective care amid rising disease burden and healthcare costs. Escalating paediatric out of pocket costs and other barriers to access, highlight the need for innovative care models. While integrated care shows promise for paediatric condition management, economic evidence remains limited. Methods: Searches were conducted between 2010 to 2025 on MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL using search terms “integrated care”, “paediatrics”, “primary care” and “cost-effectiveness”. Studies were included if they reported a cost-related outcome of a paediatric integrated care program delivered in primary care. Studies were assessed for methodological reporting quality using the CHEERS guideline. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions comprised care coordination models (n = 4), MDT-based care (n = 3) and co-consultation models (n = 2). Seven studies reported a favourable economic outcome with six being cost-effective, and one showing cost-savings. Care coordination models showed the strongest evidence for economic impact and clinical effectiveness. Conclusion: Integrated paediatric primary care models, particularly care coordination models, are economically favourable. Complex systems-level interventions show limited financial benefits; however, they are difficult to evaluate without understanding the local context of the intervention. Future research should prioritise improving the quality of economic evaluations and inclusion of societal perspectives into economic evaluation.

International Journal of Integrated CareVol. 26
The University of Melbourne (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon