Integrated assessment of natural hydrogen generation and geothermal energy co-production potential in Syria

Syria’s sedimentary basins and ophiolitic terranes host three co-located subsurface energy processes that have so far been studied in isolation: (i) hydrogen generation by low- to medium-temperature serpentinization of the Baer–Bassit ophiolite in the coastal mountain belt; (ii) hydrogen generation by radiolysis of pore and fracture water driven by the uranium–thorium–potassium decay of the Upper Cretaceous–Paleogene phosphate belt of the Palmyrides; and (iii) radiogenic heat production, locally exceeding 5–8 µW/m³ in phosphorites, which sustains elevated geothermal gradients of 38–45 °C/km in the Euphrates Graben. This study integrates these processes in a single screening framework combining a GIS-based natural-hydrogen atlas (one serpentinization review area and seven radiolysis review areas, compiled from published geological, groundwater and radiometric sources), a re-evaluated inventory of 50 decommissioned hydrocarbon wells, and consistent thermodynamic and levelized-cost modelling. Ten candidate wells passed screening; four case-study wells (2,400–3,100 m, 125–150 °C) were modelled in detail with a Carnot-limited organic Rankine cycle model yielding 2.0–4.5 MW net per well, and the full shortlist 52.7 MW and 392 GWh/yr at a capacity factor of 85%. Screening-level levelized costs of US$0.039–0.051/kWh are below greenfield binary geothermal and unsubsidised natural gas, because well repurposing eliminates 40–60% of conventional project CAPEX. Order-of-magnitude screening estimates suggest the Baer–Bassit system could sustain hydrogen fluxes of roughly 0.6–10 kt/yr (Oman-analog scaling), while radiolysis in the phosphate belt could accumulate 10⁴–10⁵ t H₂ per km³ of phosphorite over 100 Myr under porosity-limited conditions — significant only where long-lived seals exist. No verified hydrogen discovery is claimed: all targets are literature-based review areas, and a staged field programme (soil-gas surveys, groundwater sampling, well re-entry and testing) is proposed. Multi-well scenario economics show that a hybrid cluster re-entering ten existing wells and drilling four deep infill wells (4.5–5.2 km, 210–239 °C) delivers 125 MW at the lowest portfolio levelized cost of the study (US$0.037/kWh) with a net present value of ≈US$0.42 billion at an 8% discount rate. The framework links Syria’s geothermal rehabilitation pathway with the emerging global natural-hydrogen play concept and identifies where the two can share wells, infrastructure and data. Desktop screening study. No new field measurements; no verified hydrogen discovery is claimed. All targets are literature-based review areas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34941835
Primary Topic
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Integrated assessment of natural hydrogen generation and geothermal energy co-production potential in Syria

Jan Sopaheluwakan, Shad Abdelmoumen Serroune, Elodie Mercier, Khasani et al.
2 links
Figshare
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
preprint

Integrated assessment of natural hydrogen generation and geothermal energy co-production potential in Syria

Jan Sopaheluwakan, Shad Abdelmoumen Serroune, Elodie Mercier, Khasani, Jackie Hollander
preprint en

Abstract

Syria’s sedimentary basins and ophiolitic terranes host three co-located subsurface energy processes that have so far been studied in isolation: (i) hydrogen generation by low- to medium-temperature serpentinization of the Baer–Bassit ophiolite in the coastal mountain belt; (ii) hydrogen generation by radiolysis of pore and fracture water driven by the uranium–thorium–potassium decay of the Upper Cretaceous–Paleogene phosphate belt of the Palmyrides; and (iii) radiogenic heat production, locally exceeding 5–8 µW/m³ in phosphorites, which sustains elevated geothermal gradients of 38–45 °C/km in the Euphrates Graben. This study integrates these processes in a single screening framework combining a GIS-based natural-hydrogen atlas (one serpentinization review area and seven radiolysis review areas, compiled from published geological, groundwater and radiometric sources), a re-evaluated inventory of 50 decommissioned hydrocarbon wells, and consistent thermodynamic and levelized-cost modelling. Ten candidate wells passed screening; four case-study wells (2,400–3,100 m, 125–150 °C) were modelled in detail with a Carnot-limited organic Rankine cycle model yielding 2.0–4.5 MW net per well, and the full shortlist 52.7 MW and 392 GWh/yr at a capacity factor of 85%. Screening-level levelized costs of US$0.039–0.051/kWh are below greenfield binary geothermal and unsubsidised natural gas, because well repurposing eliminates 40–60% of conventional project CAPEX. Order-of-magnitude screening estimates suggest the Baer–Bassit system could sustain hydrogen fluxes of roughly 0.6–10 kt/yr (Oman-analog scaling), while radiolysis in the phosphate belt could accumulate 10⁴–10⁵ t H₂ per km³ of phosphorite over 100 Myr under porosity-limited conditions — significant only where long-lived seals exist. No verified hydrogen discovery is claimed: all targets are literature-based review areas, and a staged field programme (soil-gas surveys, groundwater sampling, well re-entry and testing) is proposed. Multi-well scenario economics show that a hybrid cluster re-entering ten existing wells and drilling four deep infill wells (4.5–5.2 km, 210–239 °C) delivers 125 MW at the lowest portfolio levelized cost of the study (US$0.037/kWh) with a net present value of ≈US$0.42 billion at an 8% discount rate. The framework links Syria’s geothermal rehabilitation pathway with the emerging global natural-hydrogen play concept and identifies where the two can share wells, infrastructure and data. Desktop screening study. No new field measurements; no verified hydrogen discovery is claimed. All targets are literature-based review areas.

Figshare
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon