When sustainability backfires: Gen Z’s perceptions of greenwashing and trust in corporate campaigns

Purpose Corporate sustainability initiatives have come under growing criticism for greenwashing practices that undermine the credibility of sustainability marketing and erode consumer trust. This study aims to explore how Generation Z consumers in Vietnam differentiate between authentic sustainability claims and greenwashing signals in digital marketing communications. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research design was adopted using semi-structured interviews with 15–20 Generation Z participants aged 18–27 in Vietnam. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis approach. Findings The findings reveal that Gen Z consumers rely strongly on evidence-based cues such as quantified environmental impact, third-party certifications and transparency signals to assess authenticity. In contrast, vague claims and aesthetic “green” imagery without supporting evidence trigger skepticism and perceptions of greenwashing. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by proposing a cue-based process model explaining how Gen Z forms green trust in digital marketing environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Responsibility Journal
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-03-2026-0290
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

When sustainability backfires: Gen Z’s perceptions of greenwashing and trust in corporate campaigns

Phuong Thi Nguyen, Han My Giang, Tu Tran La, Vu Minh Phuong Nguyen et al.
4 links
Social Responsibility Journal
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

When sustainability backfires: Gen Z’s perceptions of greenwashing and trust in corporate campaigns

Phuong Thi Nguyen, Han My Giang, Tu Tran La, Vu Minh Phuong Nguyen, Tran Thuy Anh Le
article en

Abstract

Purpose Corporate sustainability initiatives have come under growing criticism for greenwashing practices that undermine the credibility of sustainability marketing and erode consumer trust. This study aims to explore how Generation Z consumers in Vietnam differentiate between authentic sustainability claims and greenwashing signals in digital marketing communications. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research design was adopted using semi-structured interviews with 15–20 Generation Z participants aged 18–27 in Vietnam. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis approach. Findings The findings reveal that Gen Z consumers rely strongly on evidence-based cues such as quantified environmental impact, third-party certifications and transparency signals to assess authenticity. In contrast, vague claims and aesthetic “green” imagery without supporting evidence trigger skepticism and perceptions of greenwashing. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by proposing a cue-based process model explaining how Gen Z forms green trust in digital marketing environments.

Social Responsibility Journal
Ho Chi Minh City University of Economics and Finance (VN), Western Sydney University (AU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
When sustainability backfires: Gen Z’s perceptions of greenwashing and trust in corporate campaigns — Phuong Thi Nguyen, Han My Giang, et al. · Social Responsibility Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS