Psychometric evaluation of an adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR)

Background Accurate assessment of physical activity is crucial for public health surveillance; however, the psychometric properties of the adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR) remain understudied in community-based Egyptian populations, creating a gap in local health monitoring tools. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the GPAQ-AR in Egyptian adults. Methods This cross-sectional validation study with a two-week follow-up included 151 healthy adults (76 males, 75 females) from Egypt. To assess test-retest reliability, the GPAQ-AR was administered on two occasions, two weeks apart. Criterion validity was evaluated by comparing the GPAQ-AR and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) against average daily step counts from a pedometer worn for seven consecutive days. Results The GPAQ-AR showed high test-retest consistency for both males [ r = .840–.991, 95% CI (.758, .994)] and females [ r = .686–.980, 95% CI (.544, .987)]. It demonstrated excellent absolute agreement for total energy expenditure (males: ICC = .933; females: ICC = .898). High convergence was found with the subjective IPAQ-SF for both males [ r = .896, 95% CI (.857, .925)] and females [ r = .907, 95% CI (.872, .933)]. However, its association with objective pedometer data was weak, showing no significant correlation for males [ r = .005, 95% CI (−.155, .164)] and a significant but weak negative correlation for females [ r = −.257, 95% CI (−.398, −.101)]. The GPAQ-AR yielded substantially higher estimates of physical activity volume than could be captured by ambulatory step counts. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence that the GPAQ-AR demonstrates high test-retest but shows limited association with objective ambulatory activity. Due to the construct mismatch between total reported energy expenditure and ambulatory steps, the GPAQ-AR is more suitable for ranking individuals' physical activity levels than for determining absolute energy expenditure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1663425
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Psychometric evaluation of an adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR)

Hoda Youssef, Turki Mohsen Alzahrani, Achraf Ammar, Sheref Mohamed et al.
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Physical Activity and Health
article

Psychometric evaluation of an adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR)

Hoda Youssef, Turki Mohsen Alzahrani, Achraf Ammar, Sheref Mohamed, Mohamed Aly
article en

Abstract

Background Accurate assessment of physical activity is crucial for public health surveillance; however, the psychometric properties of the adapted Arabic version of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ-AR) remain understudied in community-based Egyptian populations, creating a gap in local health monitoring tools. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the GPAQ-AR in Egyptian adults. Methods This cross-sectional validation study with a two-week follow-up included 151 healthy adults (76 males, 75 females) from Egypt. To assess test-retest reliability, the GPAQ-AR was administered on two occasions, two weeks apart. Criterion validity was evaluated by comparing the GPAQ-AR and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire—Short Form (IPAQ-SF) against average daily step counts from a pedometer worn for seven consecutive days. Results The GPAQ-AR showed high test-retest consistency for both males [ r = .840–.991, 95% CI (.758, .994)] and females [ r = .686–.980, 95% CI (.544, .987)]. It demonstrated excellent absolute agreement for total energy expenditure (males: ICC = .933; females: ICC = .898). High convergence was found with the subjective IPAQ-SF for both males [ r = .896, 95% CI (.857, .925)] and females [ r = .907, 95% CI (.872, .933)]. However, its association with objective pedometer data was weak, showing no significant correlation for males [ r = .005, 95% CI (−.155, .164)] and a significant but weak negative correlation for females [ r = −.257, 95% CI (−.398, −.101)]. The GPAQ-AR yielded substantially higher estimates of physical activity volume than could be captured by ambulatory step counts. Conclusions This study provides preliminary evidence that the GPAQ-AR demonstrates high test-retest but shows limited association with objective ambulatory activity. Due to the construct mismatch between total reported energy expenditure and ambulatory steps, the GPAQ-AR is more suitable for ranking individuals' physical activity levels than for determining absolute energy expenditure.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 8
University of Jordan (JO), University of Sfax (TN), Taif University (SA), Zagazig University (EG), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Institut Supérieur du Sport et de l’Éducation Physique de Sfax (TN), Faculty of Medicine of Sfax (TN), Assiut University (EG), Chukyo University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon