A Biologically Grounded Theory of Physical Computation

Biological nervous systems reason through the coordinated activity of interacting neurons rather than through a single centralized computational element. Sensory signals are continuously integrated with recurrent activity, prior experience, adaptation, and competing interpretations. These processes motivate an investigation of whether analogous physical dynamics in neuromorphic hardware can support reasoning. This paper develops a framework for reasoning as collective state evolution and selection within coupled dynamical networks. It models reasoning, drawing on recurrent circuits and attractor dynamics, as two regimes of one continuous-time system: exploration, in which candidate interpretations compete, persist and reorganize, and commitment, in which dissipative relaxation stabilizes one. The regimes are generated by a candidate vector field combining a conservative (Hamiltonian-type) term and a dissipative (Lyapunov-type) term, constrained by metriplectic-type degeneracy conditions. We show these conditions cannot hold in two state dimensions with a non-constant landscape and a nonzero skew operator, and give a three-variable construction in which they hold exactly. The candidate substrate is a lattice of Mead-inspired transconductance–capacitor (Gm–C) cells with a self-field; the circuit realization of the conservative term remains open. A five-level hierarchy, from local physical law to task-relative semantic evaluation, is to be validated at each transition by a commuting-diagram condition and an intervention criterion. The framework does not assume that biological reasoning has been reproduced or that analog implementation guarantees efficiency. It specifies measurements against accumulator, attractor and digital baselines, an energy–time–accuracy accounting, and falsification conditions. No hardware or circuit results are reported. Numerical examples in Sections 5.1 and 7.4 are reproduced by the deposited Python script (reproduce_numerical_values.py; see README.md)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24015279
Primary Topic
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

A Biologically Grounded Theory of Physical Computation

David Wert
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
preprint

A Biologically Grounded Theory of Physical Computation

David Wert
preprint en

Abstract

Biological nervous systems reason through the coordinated activity of interacting neurons rather than through a single centralized computational element. Sensory signals are continuously integrated with recurrent activity, prior experience, adaptation, and competing interpretations. These processes motivate an investigation of whether analogous physical dynamics in neuromorphic hardware can support reasoning. This paper develops a framework for reasoning as collective state evolution and selection within coupled dynamical networks. It models reasoning, drawing on recurrent circuits and attractor dynamics, as two regimes of one continuous-time system: exploration, in which candidate interpretations compete, persist and reorganize, and commitment, in which dissipative relaxation stabilizes one. The regimes are generated by a candidate vector field combining a conservative (Hamiltonian-type) term and a dissipative (Lyapunov-type) term, constrained by metriplectic-type degeneracy conditions. We show these conditions cannot hold in two state dimensions with a non-constant landscape and a nonzero skew operator, and give a three-variable construction in which they hold exactly. The candidate substrate is a lattice of Mead-inspired transconductance–capacitor (Gm–C) cells with a self-field; the circuit realization of the conservative term remains open. A five-level hierarchy, from local physical law to task-relative semantic evaluation, is to be validated at each transition by a commuting-diagram condition and an intervention criterion. The framework does not assume that biological reasoning has been reproduced or that analog implementation guarantees efficiency. It specifies measurements against accumulator, attractor and digital baselines, an energy–time–accuracy accounting, and falsification conditions. No hardware or circuit results are reported. Numerical examples in Sections 5.1 and 7.4 are reproduced by the deposited Python script (reproduce_numerical_values.py; see README.md)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon