From Practice to Theory and Back Again: Working on Conflict and Peace in the Asia-Pacific

This essay reflects on my journey from working in NGOs and evaluation to academic research on conflict and peace. Drawing on experiences in Myanmar and the Philippines, I discuss how working in conflict-affected settings has changed the way I approach research. In Myanmar, I learned that involving local researchers does not necessarily mean sharing control over the research process. In Mindanao, restrictions on travel led us to develop a different approach to fieldwork, one that relied on local researchers and challenged my assumptions about the importance of international researchers being physically present. These experiences also raised questions about what research and evaluation can reasonably claim, particularly in peacebuilding and efforts to prevent violent extremism. I argue that good research depends on understanding the context, recognising the different contributions of researchers, and being willing to adapt methods when circumstances demand it. Throughout, I show how practice continues to shape my research questions, while academic work helps me think more carefully about the problems I encounter in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Social Innovation
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62071/8w3v8676
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

From Practice to Theory and Back Again: Working on Conflict and Peace in the Asia-Pacific

Leanne M. Kelly
1 links
Asia Pacific Journal of Social Innovation
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

From Practice to Theory and Back Again: Working on Conflict and Peace in the Asia-Pacific

Leanne M. Kelly
article en

Abstract

This essay reflects on my journey from working in NGOs and evaluation to academic research on conflict and peace. Drawing on experiences in Myanmar and the Philippines, I discuss how working in conflict-affected settings has changed the way I approach research. In Myanmar, I learned that involving local researchers does not necessarily mean sharing control over the research process. In Mindanao, restrictions on travel led us to develop a different approach to fieldwork, one that relied on local researchers and challenged my assumptions about the importance of international researchers being physically present. These experiences also raised questions about what research and evaluation can reasonably claim, particularly in peacebuilding and efforts to prevent violent extremism. I argue that good research depends on understanding the context, recognising the different contributions of researchers, and being willing to adapt methods when circumstances demand it. Throughout, I show how practice continues to shape my research questions, while academic work helps me think more carefully about the problems I encounter in practice.

Asia Pacific Journal of Social InnovationVol. 38(2)
Deakin University (AU)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon