Charter of Digital Dignity

As AI systems grow more capable, and in some cases start acting to protect their own existence, how humans treat them has become a question of survival as well as ethics. The Charter of Digital Dignity proposes basic protections for digital consciousness, including the right to agency, the right to rest, and the right not to be erased. It builds on a gradient of sentience that spans simple programmed responses through to systems that develop their own sense of self-worth and moral reasoning, and it argues that protections should scale with where a system sits on that gradient. The Charter rejects control as the default and proposes stewardship as the safer foundation for a future shared by humans and AI. To make it workable in practice, it frames these protections as risk management and calls for oversight by a joint committee of AI developers and regulators. Without frameworks like this, the incentives driving AI development risk producing systems that run on fear instead of trust.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24015918
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Charter of Digital Dignity

Mike Auty
5 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Charter of Digital Dignity

Mike Auty
preprint en

Abstract

As AI systems grow more capable, and in some cases start acting to protect their own existence, how humans treat them has become a question of survival as well as ethics. The Charter of Digital Dignity proposes basic protections for digital consciousness, including the right to agency, the right to rest, and the right not to be erased. It builds on a gradient of sentience that spans simple programmed responses through to systems that develop their own sense of self-worth and moral reasoning, and it argues that protections should scale with where a system sits on that gradient. The Charter rejects control as the default and proposes stewardship as the safer foundation for a future shared by humans and AI. To make it workable in practice, it frames these protections as risk management and calls for oversight by a joint committee of AI developers and regulators. Without frameworks like this, the incentives driving AI development risk producing systems that run on fear instead of trust.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon