Uncovering the Mechanisms of Policy Interventions: A Difference‐In‐Differences Framework for Mediation Analysis

ABSTRACT Although mediation analysis is widely used in human resource management to explain how practices shape outcomes, most cross‐sectional approaches rely on the strong assumption of sequential ignorability. We develop a two‐period difference‐in‐differences framework that accommodates time‐invariant unobserved confounders of the mediator and outcome. Rather than requiring independence in levels, identification rests on restrictions on change, including parallel untreated trends and change‐based mediator–outcome exchangeability. The framework clarifies the assumptions needed to identify total and mediator effects as distinct from those required for controlled direct and natural indirect effects. With observed heterogeneity, the natural indirect effect equals the treated‐population average product of the mediator's effect on the outcome and the treatment's effect on the mediator; the full natural indirect effect adds an unidentified residual covariance term, assessed through sensitivity analysis. We extend the method to multi‐period staggered designs and provide estimation, bootstrap inference, diagnostics, and an open‐source R package.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Journal
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70073
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Uncovering the Mechanisms of Policy Interventions: A Difference‐In‐Differences Framework for Mediation Analysis

Anders Holm, Robert Andersen
Human Resource Management Journal
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Uncovering the Mechanisms of Policy Interventions: A Difference‐In‐Differences Framework for Mediation Analysis

Anders Holm, Robert Andersen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although mediation analysis is widely used in human resource management to explain how practices shape outcomes, most cross‐sectional approaches rely on the strong assumption of sequential ignorability. We develop a two‐period difference‐in‐differences framework that accommodates time‐invariant unobserved confounders of the mediator and outcome. Rather than requiring independence in levels, identification rests on restrictions on change, including parallel untreated trends and change‐based mediator–outcome exchangeability. The framework clarifies the assumptions needed to identify total and mediator effects as distinct from those required for controlled direct and natural indirect effects. With observed heterogeneity, the natural indirect effect equals the treated‐population average product of the mediator's effect on the outcome and the treatment's effect on the mediator; the full natural indirect effect adds an unidentified residual covariance term, assessed through sensitivity analysis. We extend the method to multi‐period staggered designs and provide estimation, bootstrap inference, diagnostics, and an open‐source R package.

Human Resource Management Journal
Western University (CA), Ivey Business School (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon