Comparative cost analysis of electric, hydrogen, and mixed-fleet energy supply modes for a trackless tram line

Trackless trams offer a medium-capacity solution, yet a unified framework for comparing alternative energy modes is lacking. Focusing on the economic dimension of sustainability, this study develops a cost model integrating fixed, operating, and user costs to evaluate battery-electric, hydrogen fuel-cell, and mixed-fleet (a combination of both) modes for trackless trams. Using operational data from Yibin's T2 line, the model quantifies vehicle procurement, energy facilities, driver wages, energy consumption, maintenance, passenger waiting, and in-vehicle time. The results show that the battery-electric mode achieves the lowest daily cost, followed by the mixed-fleet mode, with user costs dominating all modes. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the hydrogen tram procurement cost significantly affects hydrogen-based competitiveness, while extending the facility service life yields limited benefits due to user cost predominance. These findings provide a quantitative basis for energy mode selection, suggesting that reducing passenger time costs may improve system economics more than focusing solely on energy technology advances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sustainable Energy
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2026.2753992
Primary Topic
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Comparative cost analysis of electric, hydrogen, and mixed-fleet energy supply modes for a trackless tram line

Bo Du, Jiaxin Guo, Meng Xu, Tao Liu
2 links
International Journal of Sustainable Energy
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
article

Comparative cost analysis of electric, hydrogen, and mixed-fleet energy supply modes for a trackless tram line

Bo Du, Jiaxin Guo, Meng Xu, Tao Liu
article en

Abstract

Trackless trams offer a medium-capacity solution, yet a unified framework for comparing alternative energy modes is lacking. Focusing on the economic dimension of sustainability, this study develops a cost model integrating fixed, operating, and user costs to evaluate battery-electric, hydrogen fuel-cell, and mixed-fleet (a combination of both) modes for trackless trams. Using operational data from Yibin's T2 line, the model quantifies vehicle procurement, energy facilities, driver wages, energy consumption, maintenance, passenger waiting, and in-vehicle time. The results show that the battery-electric mode achieves the lowest daily cost, followed by the mixed-fleet mode, with user costs dominating all modes. Sensitivity analyses indicate that the hydrogen tram procurement cost significantly affects hydrogen-based competitiveness, while extending the facility service life yields limited benefits due to user cost predominance. These findings provide a quantitative basis for energy mode selection, suggesting that reducing passenger time costs may improve system economics more than focusing solely on energy technology advances.

International Journal of Sustainable EnergyVol. 45(1)
Griffith University (AU), Beijing Jiaotong University (CN), Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Affordable and clean energy, Sustainable cities and communities, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon