Rights Without Remedies: The Absence of Intermediary Liability and Notice-and-Takedown Mechanisms in Tanzania's Copyright Law, and Lessons from Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda

Tanzania’s Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, Cap. 218 R.E. 2023, confers broad and technologically neutral exclusive rights that are capable of reaching online reproduction, distribution and communication to the public, but it contains no provision on intermediary liability, no notice-and-takedown procedure and no copyright-specific cross-border notice-and-takedown or intermediary-compliance mechanism. Tanzanian law is nevertheless not without a route against platform-mediated infringement. The Cybercrimes Act, 2015 allows any person to notify infringing material (section 45); the Cybercrimes (General) Regulations, 2016 require a response within 24 hours (regulation 7); and the Online Content Regulations, 2020 oblige online content hosts to ensure that prohibited contents, which include content infringing intellectual property rights, are removed upon notification by the Authority or affected party (regulation 15). This article undertakes a doctrinal and comparative analysis of whether that framework is adequate to regulate and enforce copyright protection against platform-mediated online infringement. The article finds that the framework provides a general legal route for takedown and conditional intermediary protections, but that its statutory design lacks a coherent copyright-specific procedure with clear standards, counter-notice safeguards and an expressly assigned institutional role. The article recommends a copyright-specific conditional safe-harbor regime in the Copyright Act that builds on, and for copyright displaces, the existing cybercrime route: a prescribed notice, objective removal standards, a counter-notice and restoration procedure, a statutory role for the Copyright Office of Tanzania (COSOTA), a civil compliance and liability framework alongside the existing offences, and a 72-hour default period for screening, notifying the uploader and taking initial action.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law Management & Humanities
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63108/ijlmh.13076
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Rights Without Remedies: The Absence of Intermediary Liability and Notice-and-Takedown Mechanisms in Tanzania's Copyright Law, and Lessons from Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda

Salum Rajabu Selemani
International Journal of Law Management & Humanities
Intellectual Property Law
article

Rights Without Remedies: The Absence of Intermediary Liability and Notice-and-Takedown Mechanisms in Tanzania's Copyright Law, and Lessons from Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda

Salum Rajabu Selemani
article en

Abstract

Tanzania’s Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, Cap. 218 R.E. 2023, confers broad and technologically neutral exclusive rights that are capable of reaching online reproduction, distribution and communication to the public, but it contains no provision on intermediary liability, no notice-and-takedown procedure and no copyright-specific cross-border notice-and-takedown or intermediary-compliance mechanism. Tanzanian law is nevertheless not without a route against platform-mediated infringement. The Cybercrimes Act, 2015 allows any person to notify infringing material (section 45); the Cybercrimes (General) Regulations, 2016 require a response within 24 hours (regulation 7); and the Online Content Regulations, 2020 oblige online content hosts to ensure that prohibited contents, which include content infringing intellectual property rights, are removed upon notification by the Authority or affected party (regulation 15). This article undertakes a doctrinal and comparative analysis of whether that framework is adequate to regulate and enforce copyright protection against platform-mediated online infringement. The article finds that the framework provides a general legal route for takedown and conditional intermediary protections, but that its statutory design lacks a coherent copyright-specific procedure with clear standards, counter-notice safeguards and an expressly assigned institutional role. The article recommends a copyright-specific conditional safe-harbor regime in the Copyright Act that builds on, and for copyright displaces, the existing cybercrime route: a prescribed notice, objective removal standards, a counter-notice and restoration procedure, a statutory role for the Copyright Office of Tanzania (COSOTA), a civil compliance and liability framework alongside the existing offences, and a 72-hour default period for screening, notifying the uploader and taking initial action.

International Journal of Law Management & HumanitiesVol. 9(V)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon