Evaluating gender equality policy alignment and institutional barriers to women’s retention in the Australian construction industry

Purpose This study aims to evaluate how Australian federal and state government gender equality initiatives align with the key factors influencing women’s retention in the construction industry. Despite an expanding policy landscape, women remain underrepresented, indicating persistent institutional and organisational barriers. Design/methodology/approach A five-step evaluative review integrated a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review, analysis of 30 government initiatives and expert validation involving 12 academics and industry practitioners. Guided by Feminist Institutionalism and the Policy Cycle Model, the analysis assessed alignment with four retention factors: Work Hours and Family Commitment (WHAF), Gendered Culture and Informal Rules (GCIR), Career Opportunities and Available Roles (COAR) and Perceptions of Women’s Ability (POWA). Findings Policy attention to gender equality has increased; however, alignment with women’s retention factors remains uneven. Most initiatives focus on career opportunities and workforce participation, while fewer address workplace culture and informal institutional barriers. Legislative and procurement-based initiatives include stronger accountability mechanisms than voluntary initiatives. Practical implications Improving women’s retention requires policy frameworks that integrate stronger accountability mechanisms with initiatives that promote workplace culture, flexible work practices and leadership pathways. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study provides the first systematic evaluation of Australian federal and state government gender equality initiatives in relation to women’s retention in the construction industry. By integrating Feminist Institutionalism and the Policy Cycle Model, this study offers a theory-informed framework for assessing policy alignment and informing future gender equality policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jedt-03-2026-0173
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Evaluating gender equality policy alignment and institutional barriers to women’s retention in the Australian construction industry

张维炜, Matthew Moorhead, Gäelle Brotto, Dena Mahmudnia et al.
Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Evaluating gender equality policy alignment and institutional barriers to women’s retention in the Australian construction industry

张维炜, Matthew Moorhead, Gäelle Brotto, Dena Mahmudnia, Roksana Jahan Tumpa, Amir Naser Ghanbaripour, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, Zahra Ghamarimajd
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to evaluate how Australian federal and state government gender equality initiatives align with the key factors influencing women’s retention in the construction industry. Despite an expanding policy landscape, women remain underrepresented, indicating persistent institutional and organisational barriers. Design/methodology/approach A five-step evaluative review integrated a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review, analysis of 30 government initiatives and expert validation involving 12 academics and industry practitioners. Guided by Feminist Institutionalism and the Policy Cycle Model, the analysis assessed alignment with four retention factors: Work Hours and Family Commitment (WHAF), Gendered Culture and Informal Rules (GCIR), Career Opportunities and Available Roles (COAR) and Perceptions of Women’s Ability (POWA). Findings Policy attention to gender equality has increased; however, alignment with women’s retention factors remains uneven. Most initiatives focus on career opportunities and workforce participation, while fewer address workplace culture and informal institutional barriers. Legislative and procurement-based initiatives include stronger accountability mechanisms than voluntary initiatives. Practical implications Improving women’s retention requires policy frameworks that integrate stronger accountability mechanisms with initiatives that promote workplace culture, flexible work practices and leadership pathways. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study provides the first systematic evaluation of Australian federal and state government gender equality initiatives in relation to women’s retention in the construction industry. By integrating Feminist Institutionalism and the Policy Cycle Model, this study offers a theory-informed framework for assessing policy alignment and informing future gender equality policy development.

Journal of Engineering Design and Technology
Bond University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Central Queensland University (AU)
Bond University
Gender equality, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon