Adaptive Conformal Risk Control for Payment Fraud Detection under Concept Drift and Delayed Feedback

Payment fraud engines turn risk scores into approve-or-review decisions, and the quantity an operator must keep within budget is the fraud value released to auto-approval. Two features of production systems undermine static guarantees on that quantity: the fraud mix drifts, and the chargebacks that reveal fraud arrive weeks after the decision, so a transaction without a chargeback is not yet known to be legitimate. We present an adaptive conformal risk controller that keeps an exposure-capped, amount-stratified and value-ordered conformal calibration layer as a monotone family of policies and steers one scalar, the nominal level of that layer, by integral feedback on chargebacks. The feedback is progressive: every approved transaction contributes inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighted increments at several label ages, which telescope to its true monetary loss when the dispute window closes. This yields a distribution-free certificate on the long-run released fraud value that holds under arbitrary drift and under a misspecified delay distribution, whereas naive and single-stage early feedback converge to biased levels. On five 24-month Sparkov streams with a camouflaged-fraud drift scenario and on the 183-day ULB/Worldline handbook stream, static calibration released 2.63 times the budget and monthly recalibration 1.55 times, while the proposed controller held 1.01 ± 0.02 times, close to an oracle with instantly revealed labels. When chargeback delays grew by 50% after deployment, it stayed at 1.08 times, against 1.48 times for single-stage correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Journal of Finance and Accounting
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54691/kzrea147
Primary Topic
Data Stream Mining Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Adaptive Conformal Risk Control for Payment Fraud Detection under Concept Drift and Delayed Feedback

Elena Arora, Mia Powell, Julia Arora
1 links
Academic Journal of Finance and Accounting
Data Stream Mining Techniques
article

Adaptive Conformal Risk Control for Payment Fraud Detection under Concept Drift and Delayed Feedback

Elena Arora, Mia Powell, Julia Arora
article en

Abstract

Payment fraud engines turn risk scores into approve-or-review decisions, and the quantity an operator must keep within budget is the fraud value released to auto-approval. Two features of production systems undermine static guarantees on that quantity: the fraud mix drifts, and the chargebacks that reveal fraud arrive weeks after the decision, so a transaction without a chargeback is not yet known to be legitimate. We present an adaptive conformal risk controller that keeps an exposure-capped, amount-stratified and value-ordered conformal calibration layer as a monotone family of policies and steers one scalar, the nominal level of that layer, by integral feedback on chargebacks. The feedback is progressive: every approved transaction contributes inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighted increments at several label ages, which telescope to its true monetary loss when the dispute window closes. This yields a distribution-free certificate on the long-run released fraud value that holds under arbitrary drift and under a misspecified delay distribution, whereas naive and single-stage early feedback converge to biased levels. On five 24-month Sparkov streams with a camouflaged-fraud drift scenario and on the 183-day ULB/Worldline handbook stream, static calibration released 2.63 times the budget and monthly recalibration 1.55 times, while the proposed controller held 1.01 ± 0.02 times, close to an oracle with instantly revealed labels. When chargeback delays grew by 50% after deployment, it stayed at 1.08 times, against 1.48 times for single-stage correction.

Academic Journal of Finance and AccountingVol. 1(5)
Microsoft (United States) (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Data Stream Mining Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon