Building Activity and Consumption Profiles in University Campuses

Opening hours are frequently reused as occupancy schedules in building-energy assessment, although access availability and occupation describe different temporal conditions. This paper quantifies this difference and relates both to metered electricity consumption in the teaching stock of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC). Published access schedules for 2025 were compiled for its eighteen teaching centers, and hourly electricity from ten verified smart meters was classified into three mutually exclusive states: (a) teaching hours, (b) open hours outside teaching hours, and (c) closed hours. At the university level, teaching hours were approximated by each center’s general teaching-hours window. Across the eighteen centers, buildings were open for about 30% to 52% of the year’s hours and closed for the remaining hours (48.3–70.5%). The share of recorded electrical consumption, however, varies in each of the categories: (a) teaching hours carried 28.5–40.4% of the recorded annual consumption in 18.2–21.7% of the time, (b) open hours outside teaching carried 19.0–36.4% in 12.5–31.7% of the year, and (c) closed hours (although being the longest state) carried 23.2–51.9%. The Barcelona School of Architecture (ETSAB) was used as a detailed case study where teaching hours were also resolved room-by-room. At least one classroom was timetabled during 21.5% of the year’s hours, the mean classroom was timetabled for 7.1% of the year (about a seventh of the building’s accessible time) and the open hours without timetabled teaching covered 26.7% of the calendar hours and 31.0% of the recorded consumption. Across the full week, whole-building consumption followed the general daily teaching-hours window (r = 0.92) more closely than the classroom timetable fraction (r = 0.77). Pooled across the ten classified meters on recorded hours, taking an “open hour without teaching” as the reference intensity (1.00), closed hours ran at 0.57 and teaching hours at 1.20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16214437
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Building Activity and Consumption Profiles in University Campuses

Marc Roca-Musach, Helena Coch Roura, Isabel Crespo García
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
article

Building Activity and Consumption Profiles in University Campuses

Marc Roca-Musach, Helena Coch Roura, Isabel Crespo García
article en

Abstract

Opening hours are frequently reused as occupancy schedules in building-energy assessment, although access availability and occupation describe different temporal conditions. This paper quantifies this difference and relates both to metered electricity consumption in the teaching stock of the Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC). Published access schedules for 2025 were compiled for its eighteen teaching centers, and hourly electricity from ten verified smart meters was classified into three mutually exclusive states: (a) teaching hours, (b) open hours outside teaching hours, and (c) closed hours. At the university level, teaching hours were approximated by each center’s general teaching-hours window. Across the eighteen centers, buildings were open for about 30% to 52% of the year’s hours and closed for the remaining hours (48.3–70.5%). The share of recorded electrical consumption, however, varies in each of the categories: (a) teaching hours carried 28.5–40.4% of the recorded annual consumption in 18.2–21.7% of the time, (b) open hours outside teaching carried 19.0–36.4% in 12.5–31.7% of the year, and (c) closed hours (although being the longest state) carried 23.2–51.9%. The Barcelona School of Architecture (ETSAB) was used as a detailed case study where teaching hours were also resolved room-by-room. At least one classroom was timetabled during 21.5% of the year’s hours, the mean classroom was timetabled for 7.1% of the year (about a seventh of the building’s accessible time) and the open hours without timetabled teaching covered 26.7% of the calendar hours and 31.0% of the recorded consumption. Across the full week, whole-building consumption followed the general daily teaching-hours window (r = 0.92) more closely than the classroom timetable fraction (r = 0.77). Pooled across the ten classified meters on recorded hours, taking an “open hour without teaching” as the reference intensity (1.00), closed hours ran at 0.57 and teaching hours at 1.20.

BuildingsVol. 16(21)
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon