Governing AI Voice Agents in Production: Latency, Safety and Evaluation Gates for Conversational AI Delivery

AI voice agents are moving from pilots into production customer operations, where they hold real-time spoken conversations with customers. They fail in ways text-based LLM systems do not: recognition errors cascade through the dialogue, response latency is experienced as rudeness or incompetence, and a hallucinated sentence spoken aloud carries an authority that text does not. This perspective paper extends the author's previously published governance framework for production LLM systems - observability, guardrails and evaluation gates operated inside the delivery cadence - to the specific physics of voice: per-turn latency budgets, speech-recognition confidence as a governed signal, spoken-output guardrails, simulated-conversation evaluation gates, and human escalation designed as a first-class deliverable. The paper proposes concrete, testable acceptance criteria and gate thresholds for voice-agent programs. It is a framework contribution, not a results study: no voice-agent deployment metrics are claimed, and every numeric budget given is labelled a design target for programs to validate in their own context.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24009782
Primary Topic
Speech and dialogue systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Governing AI Voice Agents in Production: Latency, Safety and Evaluation Gates for Conversational AI Delivery

Aarthi Arulraj
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Speech and dialogue systems
preprint

Governing AI Voice Agents in Production: Latency, Safety and Evaluation Gates for Conversational AI Delivery

Aarthi Arulraj
preprint en

Abstract

AI voice agents are moving from pilots into production customer operations, where they hold real-time spoken conversations with customers. They fail in ways text-based LLM systems do not: recognition errors cascade through the dialogue, response latency is experienced as rudeness or incompetence, and a hallucinated sentence spoken aloud carries an authority that text does not. This perspective paper extends the author's previously published governance framework for production LLM systems - observability, guardrails and evaluation gates operated inside the delivery cadence - to the specific physics of voice: per-turn latency budgets, speech-recognition confidence as a governed signal, spoken-output guardrails, simulated-conversation evaluation gates, and human escalation designed as a first-class deliverable. The paper proposes concrete, testable acceptance criteria and gate thresholds for voice-agent programs. It is a framework contribution, not a results study: no voice-agent deployment metrics are claimed, and every numeric budget given is labelled a design target for programs to validate in their own context.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Speech and dialogue systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon