From welfare to the environment: social policy, natural resources, and ecological sustainability in G20 economies

Ecological degradation has emerged as a critical challenge to achieving sustainable development, particularly in G20 economies where economic growth, social welfare objectives, and environmental constraints frequently interact. Using annual data for 17 G20 countries over 2000–2021, this study examines the effects of social welfare (SCWF), economic policy uncertainty (ECPX), trade openness (TROP), life expectancy (LIEX), natural resource rents (NARN), and tourism (TRSM) on ecological footprints (ECFP). Employing a Pooled Mean Group–Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) model, the analysis captures both short-run dynamics and long-run equilibrium relationships while accounting for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity across countries. The findings reveal that natural resource rents and social welfare expansion significantly increase ecological footprints, indicating that resource-intensive development and consumption-oriented welfare systems can undermine environmental sustainability. Life expectancy and economic policy uncertainty are negatively associated with ecological footprints. These estimates do not establish causal effects or demonstrate the influence of environmental regulation, which is not measured in the model. Trade openness exerts mixed effects, increasing environmental pressure in the short run but promoting ecological sustainability in the long run, whereas tourism consistently intensifies ecological degradation. These findings highlight the complex trade-offs between economic prosperity, social progress, and environmental protection in G20 economies. From an SDG perspective, the results provide important implications for achieving SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). The study advocates integrated policy frameworks that promote sustainable resource management, environmentally responsible tourism, and balanced welfare strategies to support long-term ecological resilience and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1945868
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

From welfare to the environment: social policy, natural resources, and ecological sustainability in G20 economies

Martijn Sander, Weiyu He
8 links
Frontiers in Environmental Science
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

From welfare to the environment: social policy, natural resources, and ecological sustainability in G20 economies

Martijn Sander, Weiyu He
article en

Abstract

Ecological degradation has emerged as a critical challenge to achieving sustainable development, particularly in G20 economies where economic growth, social welfare objectives, and environmental constraints frequently interact. Using annual data for 17 G20 countries over 2000–2021, this study examines the effects of social welfare (SCWF), economic policy uncertainty (ECPX), trade openness (TROP), life expectancy (LIEX), natural resource rents (NARN), and tourism (TRSM) on ecological footprints (ECFP). Employing a Pooled Mean Group–Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) model, the analysis captures both short-run dynamics and long-run equilibrium relationships while accounting for cross-sectional dependence and heterogeneity across countries. The findings reveal that natural resource rents and social welfare expansion significantly increase ecological footprints, indicating that resource-intensive development and consumption-oriented welfare systems can undermine environmental sustainability. Life expectancy and economic policy uncertainty are negatively associated with ecological footprints. These estimates do not establish causal effects or demonstrate the influence of environmental regulation, which is not measured in the model. Trade openness exerts mixed effects, increasing environmental pressure in the short run but promoting ecological sustainability in the long run, whereas tourism consistently intensifies ecological degradation. These findings highlight the complex trade-offs between economic prosperity, social progress, and environmental protection in G20 economies. From an SDG perspective, the results provide important implications for achieving SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). The study advocates integrated policy frameworks that promote sustainable resource management, environmentally responsible tourism, and balanced welfare strategies to support long-term ecological resilience and sustainable development.

Frontiers in Environmental ScienceVol. 14
University of Bristol (GB)
Climate action, Decent work and economic growth, Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon