Risk of cancer in psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapy: A BADBIR cohort study

BACKGROUND: There are concerns that biologic therapies for psoriasis may increase cancer risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare risks of (i) incident cancer excluding keratinocyte carcinomas (KC; hereafter referred to as cancer) and (ii) KC among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic versus non-biologic systemic therapies, and across biologic classes. METHODS: Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a UK and Republic of Ireland register collected 2007-2025, were linked to NHS Digital for enhanced cancer ascertainment. Biologic-naïve patients aged ≥16 years with chronic plaque psoriasis and no prior cancer or KC were included. Cancer or KC events occurring within 12 months of treatment initiation were excluded. Crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years (py) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% CI) were estimated using propensity score-weighted flexible parametric survival models with multiple imputation for missing data. RESULTS: The cancer and KC analyses included 18,894 and 19,144 patients, respectively (58% receiving biologics in both), reflecting differences in outcome-specific exclusion criteria. In 1-year lagged analyses, cancer incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 6.40 [95% CI 5.83-7.02] in biologic initiators and 6.83 [95% CI 6.01-7.76] in non-biologic systemic initiators, with an aHR of 0.91 [95% CI 0.77-1.07]. Corresponding KC incidence rates were 2.63 [95% CI 2.28-3.04] and 2.42 [95% CI 1.96-3.00], respectively, with an aHR of 1.05 [95% CI 0.81-1.35]. Follow-up was shorter for IL-12/23i and IL-17i than for TNFi. Cancer risk did not differ significantly for IL-12/23i or IL-17i versus TNFi, nor was KC risk elevated for IL-12/23i. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study found no evidence of an increased risk of cancer or KC with biologic compared with non-biologic systemic therapies, or across the biologic classes. Larger studies with longer follow-up, particularly for newer biologics, are needed to clarify long-term risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.70828
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Risk of cancer in psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapy: A BADBIR cohort study

Clareann H. Bunker, Oras Alabas, Nick J. Reynolds, Sarah Ryan et al.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Risk of cancer in psoriasis patients treated with biologic therapy: A BADBIR cohort study

Clareann H. Bunker, Oras Alabas, Nick J. Reynolds, Sarah Ryan, Adèle C. Green, Mark Lunt, K.J. Mason, Christopher E.M. Griffiths, Richard Bruce Warren, Catherine H. Smith
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are concerns that biologic therapies for psoriasis may increase cancer risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare risks of (i) incident cancer excluding keratinocyte carcinomas (KC; hereafter referred to as cancer) and (ii) KC among patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with biologic versus non-biologic systemic therapies, and across biologic classes. METHODS: Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a UK and Republic of Ireland register collected 2007-2025, were linked to NHS Digital for enhanced cancer ascertainment. Biologic-naïve patients aged ≥16 years with chronic plaque psoriasis and no prior cancer or KC were included. Cancer or KC events occurring within 12 months of treatment initiation were excluded. Crude incidence rates per 1000 person-years (py) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs; 95% CI) were estimated using propensity score-weighted flexible parametric survival models with multiple imputation for missing data. RESULTS: The cancer and KC analyses included 18,894 and 19,144 patients, respectively (58% receiving biologics in both), reflecting differences in outcome-specific exclusion criteria. In 1-year lagged analyses, cancer incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 6.40 [95% CI 5.83-7.02] in biologic initiators and 6.83 [95% CI 6.01-7.76] in non-biologic systemic initiators, with an aHR of 0.91 [95% CI 0.77-1.07]. Corresponding KC incidence rates were 2.63 [95% CI 2.28-3.04] and 2.42 [95% CI 1.96-3.00], respectively, with an aHR of 1.05 [95% CI 0.81-1.35]. Follow-up was shorter for IL-12/23i and IL-17i than for TNFi. Cancer risk did not differ significantly for IL-12/23i or IL-17i versus TNFi, nor was KC risk elevated for IL-12/23i. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study found no evidence of an increased risk of cancer or KC with biologic compared with non-biologic systemic therapies, or across the biologic classes. Larger studies with longer follow-up, particularly for newer biologics, are needed to clarify long-term risk.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
University College Hospital (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Royal Victoria Infirmary (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Arthritis UK (GB), Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute (GB), NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Keele University (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon