Arbitrary-order suppression of source mismatch in photonic entanglement swapping

We establish the minimum number of same-source photons needed for arbitrary-order suppression of source mismatch in photonic entanglement swapping and construct a static passive circuit family that attains it. The result applies to unencoded photons, optics that act identically on all internal states, complete photon-number-resolving detection, and local-unitary recovery of the retained qubits. For two pure source wave packets with squared overlap $u$, suppressing the bare mismatch error $\epsilon=(1-u)/2$ to order $\epsilon^r$ at nonzero ideal success probability requires at least $r$ photons from each source. A cyclic interferometer attains the minimum total of $2r$ photons at every order, with ideal acceptance $2^{2-3r}$. An exact transfer expression extends the calculation to distinct wave packets and correlated classical source noise. Near a common wave packet, the leading error is proportional to the summed delayed Hong--Ou--Mandel losses along a closed tour through each source's emissions. For equally spaced emissions, losses that increase concavely with delay select chronological wiring, whereas convex growth selects a folded order; independent fluctuations add the same leading penalty to every wiring. In a Gaussian drift model, folding lowers the smallest reachable error in the compared catalogs by about $23\%$ without adding photons. Including detection, storage, and routing losses, the photon-cost advantage depends on the target and is largest in a narrow target window; at target error $4.35\times10^{-4}$, the pooled cost is lower by a factor of about $5.6$ with equal acceptance and randomization options in both catalogs. A common spectral filter is cheaper in this finite-noise example; a separate pure-source analysis gives a regime with a better cyclic cost exponent.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24021975
Primary Topic
Quantum Information and Cryptography
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Arbitrary-order suppression of source mismatch in photonic entanglement swapping

Annan Chen
3 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Information and Cryptography
preprint

Arbitrary-order suppression of source mismatch in photonic entanglement swapping

Annan Chen
preprint en

Abstract

We establish the minimum number of same-source photons needed for arbitrary-order suppression of source mismatch in photonic entanglement swapping and construct a static passive circuit family that attains it. The result applies to unencoded photons, optics that act identically on all internal states, complete photon-number-resolving detection, and local-unitary recovery of the retained qubits. For two pure source wave packets with squared overlap $u$, suppressing the bare mismatch error $\epsilon=(1-u)/2$ to order $\epsilon^r$ at nonzero ideal success probability requires at least $r$ photons from each source. A cyclic interferometer attains the minimum total of $2r$ photons at every order, with ideal acceptance $2^{2-3r}$. An exact transfer expression extends the calculation to distinct wave packets and correlated classical source noise. Near a common wave packet, the leading error is proportional to the summed delayed Hong--Ou--Mandel losses along a closed tour through each source's emissions. For equally spaced emissions, losses that increase concavely with delay select chronological wiring, whereas convex growth selects a folded order; independent fluctuations add the same leading penalty to every wiring. In a Gaussian drift model, folding lowers the smallest reachable error in the compared catalogs by about $23\%$ without adding photons. Including detection, storage, and routing losses, the photon-cost advantage depends on the target and is largest in a narrow target window; at target error $4.35\times10^{-4}$, the pooled cost is lower by a factor of about $5.6$ with equal acceptance and randomization options in both catalogs. A common spectral filter is cheaper in this finite-noise example; a separate pure-source analysis gives a regime with a better cyclic cost exponent.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Imperial College London (GB)
Quantum Information and Cryptography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon