Comparative Analysis of Effective Stiffness Models for Immediate Deflection Prediction in Reinforced Concrete Beams

Objective: To quantify how effective-stiffness models affect immediate deflection estimates for reinforced concrete beams. Methodology: The Branson, rational Bischoff, and ACI 318-19 formulations were evaluated for rectangular sections with reinforcement ratios of 0.302.00% and applied-to-cracking moment ratios of 1.04.0, totaling 1,098 evaluations. Results: Divergence peaked immediately after cracking and at low reinforcement ratios; ACI 318-19 predicted lower stiffness and larger deflection than Branson over almost the entire domain, the only exception being a negligible reversal (below 0.1%) for the most heavily reinforced section at the highest load ratios. Limitations: No experimental database or long-term effects were considered. Originality: Dimensionless maps identify regions sensitive to model choice. Conclusions: The cracking moment, gross and cracked inertias, and adopted equation should be reported.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31224/8742
Primary Topic
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Comparative Analysis of Effective Stiffness Models for Immediate Deflection Prediction in Reinforced Concrete Beams

Rafae Hofstätter Azambuja
1 links
Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
preprint

Comparative Analysis of Effective Stiffness Models for Immediate Deflection Prediction in Reinforced Concrete Beams

Rafae Hofstätter Azambuja
preprint en

Abstract

Objective: To quantify how effective-stiffness models affect immediate deflection estimates for reinforced concrete beams. Methodology: The Branson, rational Bischoff, and ACI 318-19 formulations were evaluated for rectangular sections with reinforcement ratios of 0.302.00% and applied-to-cracking moment ratios of 1.04.0, totaling 1,098 evaluations. Results: Divergence peaked immediately after cracking and at low reinforcement ratios; ACI 318-19 predicted lower stiffness and larger deflection than Branson over almost the entire domain, the only exception being a negligible reversal (below 0.1%) for the most heavily reinforced section at the highest load ratios. Limitations: No experimental database or long-term effects were considered. Originality: Dimensionless maps identify regions sensitive to model choice. Conclusions: The cracking moment, gross and cracked inertias, and adopted equation should be reported.

Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon