Three Temporal Relations in the Description of Physical Events

Descriptions of physical events involve temporal quantities that must be distinguishedif occurrence, reference-frame description, and observation are not to be conflated. Inspecial relativity, proper time accumulated along a timelike worldline, coordinate timeassigned within an inertial reference frame, and the reception event at which a signalreaches an observer are related but conceptually different. This paper offers a didacticand mathematically explicit discussion of these three relations, using atmospheric muonsas a case study. It reviews the Minkowski-space definition of proper time, Lorentz trans-formations, the causal propagation of light signals, and the relativistic survival law forunstable particles. Particular attention is paid to dimensional consistency and to theassumptions required for simplified muon-travel estimates. The central conceptual proposalis methodological: distinguish the physical event, its coordinate description, and the laterreception of information about it. The paper does not introduce a new physical time ormodify special relativity. Rather, it organizes established concepts and identifies a researchprogram for representing particle worldlines, detector events, observer worldlines, and signalpropagation within a single spacetime framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24022562
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Three Temporal Relations in the Description of Physical Events

A. S. de Assis
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

Three Temporal Relations in the Description of Physical Events

A. S. de Assis
article en

Abstract

Descriptions of physical events involve temporal quantities that must be distinguishedif occurrence, reference-frame description, and observation are not to be conflated. Inspecial relativity, proper time accumulated along a timelike worldline, coordinate timeassigned within an inertial reference frame, and the reception event at which a signalreaches an observer are related but conceptually different. This paper offers a didacticand mathematically explicit discussion of these three relations, using atmospheric muonsas a case study. It reviews the Minkowski-space definition of proper time, Lorentz trans-formations, the causal propagation of light signals, and the relativistic survival law forunstable particles. Particular attention is paid to dimensional consistency and to theassumptions required for simplified muon-travel estimates. The central conceptual proposalis methodological: distinguish the physical event, its coordinate description, and the laterreception of information about it. The paper does not introduce a new physical time ormodify special relativity. Rather, it organizes established concepts and identifies a researchprogram for representing particle worldlines, detector events, observer worldlines, and signalpropagation within a single spacetime framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon