Svalbard, the State and Store Norske, 1916-1976

This article examines the relationship between the Norwegian state and the private Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani (Store Norske) from 1916 to 1976. It argues that Store Norske changed from being instrumental in shaping Norwegian policy towards Svalbard to becoming itself an instrument for state policy. The company played a crucial role in substantiating Norwegian sovereignty, maintaining a permanent Norwegian presence, and managing the development of Longyearbyen. In the 1920s, Store Norske became dependent on state loans and guarantees. In 1933, the state effectively took control over the company, but it remained a private enterprise. The deep and broad cooperation between the state and the company went far beyond the traditional company town model. In many instances, Store Norske acted as a proxy for the state. The author describes the relationship as a form of corporative organisation of public and private interests. As Norwegian ambitions for Svalbard grew in the 1970s, the company town model became obsolete, leading to the nationalisation of Store Norske in 1976.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Poljarnyj vestnik
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7557/6.8890
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Svalbard, the State and Store Norske, 1916-1976

Thor Bjørn Arlov
Poljarnyj vestnik
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
article

Svalbard, the State and Store Norske, 1916-1976

Thor Bjørn Arlov
article en

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the Norwegian state and the private Store Norske Spitsbergen Kulkompani (Store Norske) from 1916 to 1976. It argues that Store Norske changed from being instrumental in shaping Norwegian policy towards Svalbard to becoming itself an instrument for state policy. The company played a crucial role in substantiating Norwegian sovereignty, maintaining a permanent Norwegian presence, and managing the development of Longyearbyen. In the 1920s, Store Norske became dependent on state loans and guarantees. In 1933, the state effectively took control over the company, but it remained a private enterprise. The deep and broad cooperation between the state and the company went far beyond the traditional company town model. In many instances, Store Norske acted as a proxy for the state. The author describes the relationship as a form of corporative organisation of public and private interests. As Norwegian ambitions for Svalbard grew in the 1970s, the company town model became obsolete, leading to the nationalisation of Store Norske in 1976.

Poljarnyj vestnikVol. 29(2)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon