Reassessing Collateral Residuary Inheritance in Indonesia through Al-Sarakhsī’s Al-Mabsūṭ and Supreme Court Jurisprudence

This study examines collateral residuary inheritance by comparing al-Sarakhsī’s discussion in Al-Mabsūṭ with the Compilation of Islamic Law and literature on Indonesian Supreme Court decisions. It uses doctrinal research combining conceptual and statutory analysis with a limited examination of judicial materials. The analysis distinguishes kinship-based entitlement, the interpretation of walad as including daughters, and the authors’ proposal to consider care and financial contributions. The cited classical passages do not establish actual economic support as a general condition of residuary entitlement. Judicial literature indicates that the interpretation of walad may affect the position of the deceased’s siblings, but does not demonstrate a general contribution-based rule. The article proposes a conditional and proportionate model for legislative debate, subject to a clear legal basis, protection of fixed shares, and defined evidentiary safeguards. Social contribution alone does not authorize the cancellation of an inheritance entitlement under existing law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Adagium.
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70308/w62s6393
Primary Topic
Family and Matrimonial Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Reassessing Collateral Residuary Inheritance in Indonesia through Al-Sarakhsī’s Al-Mabsūṭ and Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Zul Ikromi, Maruba Rambe, Rahmad Padilah, Muhammad Aldi Wahyu
1 links
Adagium.
Family and Matrimonial Law
article

Reassessing Collateral Residuary Inheritance in Indonesia through Al-Sarakhsī’s Al-Mabsūṭ and Supreme Court Jurisprudence

Zul Ikromi, Maruba Rambe, Rahmad Padilah, Muhammad Aldi Wahyu
article en

Abstract

This study examines collateral residuary inheritance by comparing al-Sarakhsī’s discussion in Al-Mabsūṭ with the Compilation of Islamic Law and literature on Indonesian Supreme Court decisions. It uses doctrinal research combining conceptual and statutory analysis with a limited examination of judicial materials. The analysis distinguishes kinship-based entitlement, the interpretation of walad as including daughters, and the authors’ proposal to consider care and financial contributions. The cited classical passages do not establish actual economic support as a general condition of residuary entitlement. Judicial literature indicates that the interpretation of walad may affect the position of the deceased’s siblings, but does not demonstrate a general contribution-based rule. The article proposes a conditional and proportionate model for legislative debate, subject to a clear legal basis, protection of fixed shares, and defined evidentiary safeguards. Social contribution alone does not authorize the cancellation of an inheritance entitlement under existing law.

Adagium.Vol. 4(2)
Al-Azhar University (EG), Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Family and Matrimonial Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon