The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor in Transition: Development, Governance, and Regional Connectivity

This study examines stakeholder perceptions of Pakistan's engagement with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), with particular attention to development opportunities, governance challenges, regional inequality, environmental sustainability, and public participation. Using a qualitative design, the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 125 participants from government, academia and research, business, civil society, and local communities; the methodology also reports supplementary focus-group discussions. The findings indicate that CPEC is widely associated with infrastructure development, energy security, and regional connectivity, although perceptions differ across stakeholder groups. Government and business participants emphasize economic and strategic opportunities, whereas academic, civil-society, and community participants raise concerns about transparency, uneven benefit distribution, environmental effects, displacement, and economic dependence. Taken together, the findings suggest that CPEC's perceived long-term value depends not only on investment and connectivity but also on institutional accountability, inclusive decision-making, environmental safeguards, and equitable regional development. The study contributes a multi-stakeholder perspective to debates on infrastructure-led development and governance in Pakistan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Innovation journal of social sciences and economic review.
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36923/ijsser.v9i1.393
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor in Transition: Development, Governance, and Regional Connectivity

Khalid Zaman, Imran Naseem, Muhammad Bahar Khan
5 links
Innovation journal of social sciences and economic review.
Belt and Road Initiative
article

The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor in Transition: Development, Governance, and Regional Connectivity

Khalid Zaman, Imran Naseem, Muhammad Bahar Khan
article en

Abstract

This study examines stakeholder perceptions of Pakistan's engagement with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) through the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), with particular attention to development opportunities, governance challenges, regional inequality, environmental sustainability, and public participation. Using a qualitative design, the study draws on semi-structured interviews with 125 participants from government, academia and research, business, civil society, and local communities; the methodology also reports supplementary focus-group discussions. The findings indicate that CPEC is widely associated with infrastructure development, energy security, and regional connectivity, although perceptions differ across stakeholder groups. Government and business participants emphasize economic and strategic opportunities, whereas academic, civil-society, and community participants raise concerns about transparency, uneven benefit distribution, environmental effects, displacement, and economic dependence. Taken together, the findings suggest that CPEC's perceived long-term value depends not only on investment and connectivity but also on institutional accountability, inclusive decision-making, environmental safeguards, and equitable regional development. The study contributes a multi-stakeholder perspective to debates on infrastructure-led development and governance in Pakistan.

Innovation journal of social sciences and economic review.Vol. 9(1)
University of Haripur (PK), Abbottabad University of Science and Technology (PK), Bahçeşehir Cyprus University (CY)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Reduced inequalities, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon