Methodological, reporting and bibliometric characteristics of overviews synthesising health economic evidence.

This meta-research study will assess how overviews of systematic reviews of health economic evaluations are conducted and reported. In a broader sample that also includes overviews of other types of health economic evidence, we will describe common methodological and reporting practices and, where data permit, explore their associations with bibliometric characteristics. The findings will help determine whether an extension of the PRIOR reporting guideline is warranted and what it should cover.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ex352
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Methodological, reporting and bibliometric characteristics of overviews synthesising health economic evidence.

Joseph Kwon, Lisa Hartling, Andrew Booth, Anastasios Bastounis et al.
1 links
Open Science Framework
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Methodological, reporting and bibliometric characteristics of overviews synthesising health economic evidence.

Joseph Kwon, Lisa Hartling, Andrew Booth, Anastasios Bastounis, Phuong Bich Tran, Stavros Petrou, Ewan Tomeny
article en

Abstract

This meta-research study will assess how overviews of systematic reviews of health economic evaluations are conducted and reported. In a broader sample that also includes overviews of other types of health economic evidence, we will describe common methodological and reporting practices and, where data permit, explore their associations with bibliometric characteristics. The findings will help determine whether an extension of the PRIOR reporting guideline is warranted and what it should cover.

Open Science Framework
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon