Elafibranor improves biochemical response and favorably modifies GLOBE and UK-PBC prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis: analyses from the phase III ELATIVE® trial

Abstract Background Elafibranor demonstrated significant biochemical response in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the phase III ELATIVE ® trial. Biochemical response can be defined using various criteria, and prognostic tools such as GLOBE and UK-PBC predict estimated transplant-free survival and mortality. Here, we assess the efficacy of elafibranor across different biochemical response criteria and prognostic scores. Methods Using Week 52 data from ELATIVE ® , biochemical response was analyzed according to Paris I, Paris II, Barcelona, Toronto, Momah/Lindor, deep biochemical response, and complete biochemical response criteria. GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were calculated at baseline through Week 52; risk scores at baseline and Week 52 were used to estimate transplant-free survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years, and were analyzed in subgroups of patients according to achievement of biochemical response. Results Responder rates at Week 52 favored elafibranor over placebo across all criteria: Paris I (68.9% versus 47.2%), Paris II (43.0% versus 5.7%), Barcelona (54.7% versus 0%), Toronto (51.9% versus 9.4%), Momah/Lindor (51.9% versus 9.4%), deep biochemical response (14.2% versus 0%), and complete biochemical response (9.3% versus 0%). Based on GLOBE and UK-PBC scores at Week 52, patients receiving elafibranor had higher median estimated transplant-free survival versus placebo at 15 years (87.1% versus 82.0%; 96.7% versus 95.1%, respectively). Reductions in predicted GLOBE risk scores were seen in patients receiving elafibranor regardless of whether they had achieved biochemical response according to different criteria. Conclusions Irrespective of the criteria used, 52 weeks of elafibranor treatment resulted in consistently higher rates of biochemical response compared with placebo in patients with PBC. Predicted improvements in transplant-free survival, as assessed by two prognostic scores, corroborate these observations, and estimated reductions in liver transplant risk were seen independent of achievement of biochemical response, supporting broad efficacy of elafibranor. Trial registration Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04526665 Trial registration number: NCT04526665. Study registration date (first posted): 26/08/2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05420-1
Primary Topic
Liver Diseases and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Elafibranor improves biochemical response and favorably modifies GLOBE and UK-PBC prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis: analyses from the phase III ELATIVE® trial

Vincenza Calvaruso, C Wendy Spearman, Christopher L. Bowlus, Darren L. Asquith et al.
6 links
BMC Gastroenterology
Liver Diseases and Immunity
article

Elafibranor improves biochemical response and favorably modifies GLOBE and UK-PBC prognostic scores in primary biliary cholangitis: analyses from the phase III ELATIVE® trial

Vincenza Calvaruso, C Wendy Spearman, Christopher L. Bowlus, Darren L. Asquith, Claudia O. Zein, Mark Wayne Sonderup, Eric Lawitz, Nuno Antunes, Kris V. Kowdley, Jianfen Shu
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Elafibranor demonstrated significant biochemical response in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in the phase III ELATIVE ® trial. Biochemical response can be defined using various criteria, and prognostic tools such as GLOBE and UK-PBC predict estimated transplant-free survival and mortality. Here, we assess the efficacy of elafibranor across different biochemical response criteria and prognostic scores. Methods Using Week 52 data from ELATIVE ® , biochemical response was analyzed according to Paris I, Paris II, Barcelona, Toronto, Momah/Lindor, deep biochemical response, and complete biochemical response criteria. GLOBE and UK-PBC scores were calculated at baseline through Week 52; risk scores at baseline and Week 52 were used to estimate transplant-free survival rates at 5, 10, and 15 years, and were analyzed in subgroups of patients according to achievement of biochemical response. Results Responder rates at Week 52 favored elafibranor over placebo across all criteria: Paris I (68.9% versus 47.2%), Paris II (43.0% versus 5.7%), Barcelona (54.7% versus 0%), Toronto (51.9% versus 9.4%), Momah/Lindor (51.9% versus 9.4%), deep biochemical response (14.2% versus 0%), and complete biochemical response (9.3% versus 0%). Based on GLOBE and UK-PBC scores at Week 52, patients receiving elafibranor had higher median estimated transplant-free survival versus placebo at 15 years (87.1% versus 82.0%; 96.7% versus 95.1%, respectively). Reductions in predicted GLOBE risk scores were seen in patients receiving elafibranor regardless of whether they had achieved biochemical response according to different criteria. Conclusions Irrespective of the criteria used, 52 weeks of elafibranor treatment resulted in consistently higher rates of biochemical response compared with placebo in patients with PBC. Predicted improvements in transplant-free survival, as assessed by two prognostic scores, corroborate these observations, and estimated reductions in liver transplant risk were seen independent of achievement of biochemical response, supporting broad efficacy of elafibranor. Trial registration Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04526665 Trial registration number: NCT04526665. Study registration date (first posted): 26/08/2020.

BMC Gastroenterology
University of Cape Town (ZA), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Washington State University Spokane (US), Groote Schuur Hospital (ZA), Ipsen (United Kingdom) (GB), Liver Institute Northwest (US), Texas Liver Institute (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), University of California, Davis (US), University of Palermo (IT)
Ipsen
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Liver Diseases and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon