The Potential of Large Language Models in Gynecologic Oncology Telephone Triage

Introduction: Nurse-led telephone triage, frequently guided by the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society (UKONS) tool, is a cornerstone of supportive oncology care, yet the appropriateness of triage decisions varies across settings. Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in medical communication but remain unvalidated for autonomous clinical decision-making, particularly in gynecologic oncology, where remote and telephone-based care pose distinct challenges. Methods and Materials: Twenty fictitious case vignettes representing common treatment-related toxicities in gynecologic oncology were developed. Three board-certified gynecologic consultants independently assigned UKONS Red–Amber–Green (RAG) triage categories, reaching unanimous consensus that served as the reference standard. Vignettes were submitted verbatim, as single-turn queries with no follow-up prompting, to three publicly available LLMs (OpenEvidence, ChatGPT, Google Gemini). LLM responses were mapped to RAG categories and compared descriptively against the reference standard, stratified by treatment type and platform. Results: All three LLMs achieved 100% concordance with the reference standard for all Red cases across both treatment groups, with no high-acuity case downgraded to self-care. Discrepancies clustered at lower-acuity boundaries. In the chemotherapy-alone group, errors were limited to omission of an explicit 24-h follow-up window for 1 Amber-rated complaints. In the combined group, all LLMs over-triaged intermediate-risk complaints toward immediate or same-day evaluation; low-risk complaints showed more variable over-triage. Conclusions: LLMs identified unambiguous emergent gynecologic oncology symptoms, preserving the UKONS safety floor, but showed relatively reduced precision and a conservative over-triage bias at lower-acuity margins, especially in the combined-therapy collective. These findings support a supervised, adjunctive role for LLMs, rather than autonomous deployment, pending prospective validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16213668
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Potential of Large Language Models in Gynecologic Oncology Telephone Triage

Matteo Pavone, Iason Psilopatis, Tibor Andrea Zwimpfer, Julius Emons
4 links
Diagnostics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Potential of Large Language Models in Gynecologic Oncology Telephone Triage

Matteo Pavone, Iason Psilopatis, Tibor Andrea Zwimpfer, Julius Emons
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Nurse-led telephone triage, frequently guided by the United Kingdom Oncology Nursing Society (UKONS) tool, is a cornerstone of supportive oncology care, yet the appropriateness of triage decisions varies across settings. Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise in medical communication but remain unvalidated for autonomous clinical decision-making, particularly in gynecologic oncology, where remote and telephone-based care pose distinct challenges. Methods and Materials: Twenty fictitious case vignettes representing common treatment-related toxicities in gynecologic oncology were developed. Three board-certified gynecologic consultants independently assigned UKONS Red–Amber–Green (RAG) triage categories, reaching unanimous consensus that served as the reference standard. Vignettes were submitted verbatim, as single-turn queries with no follow-up prompting, to three publicly available LLMs (OpenEvidence, ChatGPT, Google Gemini). LLM responses were mapped to RAG categories and compared descriptively against the reference standard, stratified by treatment type and platform. Results: All three LLMs achieved 100% concordance with the reference standard for all Red cases across both treatment groups, with no high-acuity case downgraded to self-care. Discrepancies clustered at lower-acuity boundaries. In the chemotherapy-alone group, errors were limited to omission of an explicit 24-h follow-up window for 1 Amber-rated complaints. In the combined group, all LLMs over-triaged intermediate-risk complaints toward immediate or same-day evaluation; low-risk complaints showed more variable over-triage. Conclusions: LLMs identified unambiguous emergent gynecologic oncology symptoms, preserving the UKONS safety floor, but showed relatively reduced precision and a conservative over-triage bias at lower-acuity margins, especially in the combined-therapy collective. These findings support a supervised, adjunctive role for LLMs, rather than autonomous deployment, pending prospective validation.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(21)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), University of Basel (CH), University Hospital of Basel (CH), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Universitätsklinikum Erlangen (DE), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon