Association Between the Acceptability of Dietary Weighing and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploration of a Potential Screening Indicator of Poor Adherence

Background/Objectives: Although dietary therapy forms the cornerstone of type 2 diabetes management, strict regimens frequently impose significant cognitive and psychosocial burdens, reducing adherence. This cross-sectional study investigated patient acceptability of individual dietary advice commonly used in nutritional counseling and its clinical associations, aiming to identify a practical screening method for potentially poor adherence. Methods: Among 128 outpatients with type 2 diabetes receiving regular nutritional counseling, patients evaluated their acceptability of 13 standard dietary advice items using a 4-point scale (0 points = Cannot do, 3 points = Can do). We comprehensively analyzed correlations between item-specific acceptability scores and clinical characteristics, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), dietary adherence, and complications. Results: While acceptability for eating vegetables before carbohydrates was extremely high (98%), weighing staple foods and seasonings yielded the highest proportion of 0-point responses (17%, 22 patients). The acceptability score for weighing correlated positively with the nutritional counseling adherence rate (ρ = 0.25) and negatively with HbA1c (ρ = −0.19), estimated salt intake (ρ = −0.28), and diabetic retinopathy (ρ = −0.28) (all p < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression, the 0-point response to weighing remained significantly associated with lower nutritional adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36, p = 0.02), higher salt intake (OR = 1.96, p < 0.01), and elevated HbA1c (OR = 1.53, p = 0.04), even after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions: Low acceptability of weighing staple foods and seasonings was associated with poorer dietary adherence and worse glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Assessing this item may help identify patients who could benefit from individualized nutritional counseling. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its utility as a screening indicator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetology
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology7110218
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Association Between the Acceptability of Dietary Weighing and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploration of a Potential Screening Indicator of Poor Adherence

Hiroyuki Ito, Azusa Ishikawa, 春香 長田, 梓 山本 et al.
Diabetology
Diabetes Management and Education
article

Association Between the Acceptability of Dietary Weighing and Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Exploration of a Potential Screening Indicator of Poor Adherence

Hiroyuki Ito, Azusa Ishikawa, 春香 長田, 梓 山本, Minami Yokouchi, Kaori Shimada, Marina Yamashita, Sachiko Kawakubo, Naoko Wada, Sayaka Shinozuka
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Although dietary therapy forms the cornerstone of type 2 diabetes management, strict regimens frequently impose significant cognitive and psychosocial burdens, reducing adherence. This cross-sectional study investigated patient acceptability of individual dietary advice commonly used in nutritional counseling and its clinical associations, aiming to identify a practical screening method for potentially poor adherence. Methods: Among 128 outpatients with type 2 diabetes receiving regular nutritional counseling, patients evaluated their acceptability of 13 standard dietary advice items using a 4-point scale (0 points = Cannot do, 3 points = Can do). We comprehensively analyzed correlations between item-specific acceptability scores and clinical characteristics, including hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), dietary adherence, and complications. Results: While acceptability for eating vegetables before carbohydrates was extremely high (98%), weighing staple foods and seasonings yielded the highest proportion of 0-point responses (17%, 22 patients). The acceptability score for weighing correlated positively with the nutritional counseling adherence rate (ρ = 0.25) and negatively with HbA1c (ρ = −0.19), estimated salt intake (ρ = −0.28), and diabetic retinopathy (ρ = −0.28) (all p < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression, the 0-point response to weighing remained significantly associated with lower nutritional adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.36, p = 0.02), higher salt intake (OR = 1.96, p < 0.01), and elevated HbA1c (OR = 1.53, p = 0.04), even after adjusting for covariates. Conclusions: Low acceptability of weighing staple foods and seasonings was associated with poorer dietary adherence and worse glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Assessing this item may help identify patients who could benefit from individualized nutritional counseling. Further prospective studies are needed to validate its utility as a screening indicator.

DiabetologyVol. 7(11)
Edogawa Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Diabetes Management and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon