INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN USING DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

The article examines international experience in using digital platforms to support small business development, with particular attention to the institutional and organizational-economic mechanisms that make platform participation productive. The study compares the United States, China, Germany, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea, while also considering the European Union's regulatory and digital innovation framework. The analysis shows that there is no universal model of platform-based development. The United States demonstrates the role of private marketplaces and integrated digital services; China illustrates the importance of linking e-commerce with local production and logistics; Germany and Singapore emphasize digital readiness, skills, and coordinated support; and the Republic of Korea connects online trade with export assistance. The article argues that Uzbekistan should adapt these mechanisms rather than replicate foreign platforms. Priority measures include digital readiness diagnostics, platform selection, integration of sales, payment, and logistics systems, skills development, targeted financial support, and transparent platform governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24004322
Primary Topic
SMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN USING DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

Rizayeva Nilufar Oblakulovna
3 links
ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION
SMEs Development and Digital Marketing
article

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN USING DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

Rizayeva Nilufar Oblakulovna
article en

Abstract

The article examines international experience in using digital platforms to support small business development, with particular attention to the institutional and organizational-economic mechanisms that make platform participation productive. The study compares the United States, China, Germany, Singapore, and the Republic of Korea, while also considering the European Union's regulatory and digital innovation framework. The analysis shows that there is no universal model of platform-based development. The United States demonstrates the role of private marketplaces and integrated digital services; China illustrates the importance of linking e-commerce with local production and logistics; Germany and Singapore emphasize digital readiness, skills, and coordinated support; and the Republic of Korea connects online trade with export assistance. The article argues that Uzbekistan should adapt these mechanisms rather than replicate foreign platforms. Priority measures include digital readiness diagnostics, platform selection, integration of sales, payment, and logistics systems, skills development, targeted financial support, and transparent platform governance.

ECONOSCITECH INTEGRATION
Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Decent work and economic growth, Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
SMEs Development and Digital Marketing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon