Predicting rate of penetration (ROP) with machine learning models: A physics-validated comparative case study of Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)

A successful drilling operation plays a vital role in the profitability of exploration and production of hydrocarbon reserves. However, these operations can come with high drilling rig rental costs. Reliable predictions of Rate of Penetration (ROP) can avoid unnecessary drilling equipment and rig rental expenses. In this study, Gradient Boosting Regressor, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbours were developed to predict rate of penetration based on drilling operational data. The machine learning models were benchmarked with established empirical models, such as the Bingham and Bourgoyne and Young models, which are typically used to predict the rate of penetration. All machine learning models achieved, coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.93 and Average Absolute Percentage Error (AAPE) < 3% on the test dataset. Random Forest under Scenario 1 was identified as the most physically consistent model, attaining strong predictive performance with R2 = 0.9494 & AAPE = 1.96%, satisfying both the Weight on Bit (WOB) flounder point, and rotary speed optimum criteria used within the industry. These results support the practical use of machine learning-based ROP prediction as a reliable tool for real-time optimization of drilling parameters, offering a pathway to reduce non-productive time and rig costs while preserving the physical interpretability that drilling engineers require for field decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360046
Primary Topic
Drilling and Well Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Predicting rate of penetration (ROP) with machine learning models: A physics-validated comparative case study of Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)

Almostafa Alhadi, Abu Bakar Adni, Kaushik Sivaramakrishnan, Munawar A. Shaik et al.
4 links
PLoS ONE
Drilling and Well Engineering
article

Predicting rate of penetration (ROP) with machine learning models: A physics-validated comparative case study of Gradient Boosting Regressor (GBR), Random Forest (RF), and K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN)

Almostafa Alhadi, Abu Bakar Adni, Kaushik Sivaramakrishnan, Munawar A. Shaik, Mohammed Abdalla Ayoub, Noora Al Mansoori, Musaab Magzoub
article en

Abstract

A successful drilling operation plays a vital role in the profitability of exploration and production of hydrocarbon reserves. However, these operations can come with high drilling rig rental costs. Reliable predictions of Rate of Penetration (ROP) can avoid unnecessary drilling equipment and rig rental expenses. In this study, Gradient Boosting Regressor, Random Forest, and K-Nearest Neighbours were developed to predict rate of penetration based on drilling operational data. The machine learning models were benchmarked with established empirical models, such as the Bingham and Bourgoyne and Young models, which are typically used to predict the rate of penetration. All machine learning models achieved, coefficient of determination (R2) > 0.93 and Average Absolute Percentage Error (AAPE) < 3% on the test dataset. Random Forest under Scenario 1 was identified as the most physically consistent model, attaining strong predictive performance with R2 = 0.9494 & AAPE = 1.96%, satisfying both the Weight on Bit (WOB) flounder point, and rotary speed optimum criteria used within the industry. These results support the practical use of machine learning-based ROP prediction as a reliable tool for real-time optimization of drilling parameters, offering a pathway to reduce non-productive time and rig costs while preserving the physical interpretability that drilling engineers require for field decision making.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(11)
University of Strathclyde (GB), United Arab Emirates University (AE), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
United Arab Emirates University
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Drilling and Well Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon