Macro- and socioeconomic indicators for technology assessment: Methods and case studies

A multidimensional impact assessment makes it possible to assess the strengths and weaknesses of technology variants in relation to various indicators and to incorporate this knowledge into decisions on private or public investments. Although methods to quantify microeconomic and environmental impacts have been established for a long time, there are only few approaches to assess macroeconomic or socioeconomic impacts of individual technologies in a robust way. This paper therefore presents a new method on how macroeconomic indicators such as employment effects, value added, the competitiveness of national industry on the world market, and geopolitical risks can be calculated for individual technologies, based on established methods for quantifying macroeconomic indicators at the level of the economy as a whole. In addition, new methods are being developed to determine socioeconomic indicators such as transaction costs (non-monetary), opportunities for financial participation, and perceived risks and barriers. It is noticeable here that it is often not enough to rely purely on technological features to quantify the indicators; surveys, for example, must also be used. All indicators were developed in a co-design process together with stakeholders from research, industry and civil society, which, among other things, guarantees the relevance and practicality of the indicators. The newly developed indicators were tested using case studies from the areas of mobility, heating, and electricity generation. The results show that the macro- and socioeconomic indicators presented here allow integrating important new perspectives into a multidimensional impact assessment or a multi-criteria decision analysis. As these perspectives have often been neglected to date, the new indicators presented here represent new and valuable additions to multidimensional impact assessment of energy and transport technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109814
Primary Topic
Technology Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Macro- and socioeconomic indicators for technology assessment: Methods and case studies

Urte Brand-Daniels, Jonas Eschmann, M. Vöge, Tobias Naegler et al.
Energy Reports
Technology Assessment and Management
article

Macro- and socioeconomic indicators for technology assessment: Methods and case studies

Urte Brand-Daniels, Jonas Eschmann, M. Vöge, Tobias Naegler, Mareike Tippe, Bert Droste-Franke, Ralf Isenmann, Barbara Breitschopf
article en

Abstract

A multidimensional impact assessment makes it possible to assess the strengths and weaknesses of technology variants in relation to various indicators and to incorporate this knowledge into decisions on private or public investments. Although methods to quantify microeconomic and environmental impacts have been established for a long time, there are only few approaches to assess macroeconomic or socioeconomic impacts of individual technologies in a robust way. This paper therefore presents a new method on how macroeconomic indicators such as employment effects, value added, the competitiveness of national industry on the world market, and geopolitical risks can be calculated for individual technologies, based on established methods for quantifying macroeconomic indicators at the level of the economy as a whole. In addition, new methods are being developed to determine socioeconomic indicators such as transaction costs (non-monetary), opportunities for financial participation, and perceived risks and barriers. It is noticeable here that it is often not enough to rely purely on technological features to quantify the indicators; surveys, for example, must also be used. All indicators were developed in a co-design process together with stakeholders from research, industry and civil society, which, among other things, guarantees the relevance and practicality of the indicators. The newly developed indicators were tested using case studies from the areas of mobility, heating, and electricity generation. The results show that the macro- and socioeconomic indicators presented here allow integrating important new perspectives into a multidimensional impact assessment or a multi-criteria decision analysis. As these perspectives have often been neglected to date, the new indicators presented here represent new and valuable additions to multidimensional impact assessment of energy and transport technologies.

Energy ReportsVol. 16
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Wilhelm Büchner Hochschule (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (DE)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Technology Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon